@Canucks de Vancouver

Perspectives d’élite sur Studnicka


Perspectives d’élite sur Studnicka


NerdPunch

7 Comments

  1. NerdPunch

    https://twitter.com/danielgscouting/status/1585802421221355521?s=46&t=gbAjvzaSHDTo63I1PlQjjw

    > .@eliteprospects Lead Scout @DavidSt_Louis’ take on new #Canucks  forward Jack Studnicka (from a trade deadline piece from last season.)

    https://twitter.com/_tyanderson/status/1585822356190158849?s=46&t=gbAjvzaSHDTo63I1PlQjjw

    > I asked Sweeney why it didn’t work for Studnicka. Said pandemic year really threw his development off. « He just kinda stalled, and then it was up-and-down, in-and-out. No fault of Jack’s [end], maybe more fault on ours. »

  2. pluralsight24

    Unfortunately Jack’s missing element sounds like what most of our team is struggling with right now

  3. ReallyBigCool

    Maybe Hogs can give him some elite puck protection tips.

  4. Reign_Nateo

    I don’t think anyone can make any concrete decisions on Studnicka at this point, his usage has been just too inconsistent. He’s hardly played 2 NHL games in a row at this point. Bruins soured on him, coach didn’t feel a need to use him. He’ll get a good run in Vancouver and we’ll see what we have.

  5. Gooch_09

    What a stupid trade. I get Lazar is out injured but WTF. We don’t need him and definitely not at the price we paid. Myenberg was depth. Long shot depth but why trade a RHD?

    – Mikheyev signing – fail
    – Dickinson trade – fail
    – DiPietro trade – fail

    These three moves don’t help our future and have either given up cap space, picks or prospects (everything we should be getting in return!)

    JR and PA still need to prove that they’re competent managers and not just perpetuating the historical stupidity of this franchise.

  6. canucklehead200

    Aren’t our « analysts » supposed to dig into underlying player stats and steer the front office away from players like Studdy?

Write A Comment

Pin