Regardez les Canucks de Vancouver défier avec succès un but de Mark Stone des Golden Knights de Vegas après que la rondelle a été déclarée morte après avoir heurté une caméra à travers une petite fenêtre dans la vitre.
@Golden Knights de Vegas
19 Comments
Should have been a goal in my opinion. Refs didn't whistle, and the Canucks had time to resettle.
At least they got it right…
Those camera guys had a thing they can slide to close that hole. This guy didn’t do that. He’ll probably get fired lol.
Still doesn't matter because we can't hold a lead if our lives depended on it lmao
Why should there have been a stoppage in play?
I can see the call going that way after review if the puck was being directed over the glass (which would’ve nullified the goal at the cost of a delay-of-game penalty) but this was a camera at ice level.
DJ is killing it with Bloc Party
Hope the camera guy got moved the upper bowl. Should be using the glass cover.
Shouldn't that be 2 for Vancouver then? Same as if they shot it over the glass clean?
This play is weird because of how unlikely it is to happen and how rarely it does happen but it's no different than when the puck hits somebody on the bench.
Well played by Vegas to score, but a good call to challenge it, it was out, and I’m pretty sure that camera man has some explaining to do at very least
they lost anyways because Canucks
On a lighter note, let's put our hands together for the cameraman. He singlehandedly stopped more goals than Thatcher Demko did all night. Canucks should hire him on the spot XD.
i love emilie's expression. its like "oooweee, my boss is about to have a fit"
This is wild. Interesting rule, I've never seen it. As a Canuck fan that's great (irrelevant to the outcome…) and as a referee, I'd be like "wtf do we do?"
This has to be one of the strangest moments of the season so far…. The likelyhood of it happening is so miniscule.
Delay of game penalty then?
Weird nhl moments
Not the camera!
The cameraman – 2 minutes for interference