@Canucks de Vancouver

Nils Aman des Canucks aurait-il dû marquer un but malgré le décrochage du filet des Coyotes?



Le panel Hockey Night in Canada discute des différences entre le but des Canucks de Vancouver qui a été annulé contre les Coyotes de l’Arizona et le but que Mark Giordano a marqué contre les Sabres de Buffalo qui comptait après avoir fait l’objet d’un examen.

18 Comments

  1. I mean…if Giordano's goal against Buffalo counted, then yes, the Canucks' goal should've counted

  2. This makes no sense, Aman shoots when the net is still in the moorings, and the “first shot” after the net is removed goes in. Bad ruling and a bad call imo.

  3. In inconsistency in the NHL baffles me. So if the Leafs do it. Good goal. Canucks do it. No goal?

  4. The rules are different for the nucks, the opposing team even knocked it off by themselves 🤷‍♂️

  5. Makemelaughs are always biased against nucks and change the rules from play to play so the nucks never win and leafs always do.

  6. I think these analysts are missing the point. Which is IMO that in both instances, #90 for Canucks and #89 for Sabres both slid into the post and knock the net off, preventing the goal. It could be interpreted they did this on purpose. Not sure of the NHL rule on that but if there isn't one yet, there should be.

  7. If it counted when Giordano scored it against the Buffaloes, it counts when the Canucks score the same goal against Phoenix.

  8. Yes. The Canucks goal should've counted. These pegs need to be stronger. It probably takes something like a Connor McDavid shot or whoever and a goaltender accidentally or purposely kicking it off or whatever.

  9. It shouldn’t matter that he put in the rebound. The defencemen wasn’t pushed in, he took the net off himself. Same rule should apply. Play was still live and the puck went into where the net should have been.

Write A Comment

Pin