@Rangers de New York

Gallant reconnaît qu’il existe un meilleur top 6 mais ne les utilisera pas.


Gallant reconnaît qu’il existe un meilleur top 6 mais ne les utilisera pas.


iiKrOna

3 Comments

  1. FoghornLeghorn99

    What the fuck does this even mean?

    1. It seems like he thinks they played better based on his eye and analytics, but is just rolling with Vesey

    2. why invest in expanding analytics if you’re just going to ignore them?

    Everyday Gallant makes less sense.

  2. AIC_333

    What drives me insane is that in the press conference, he said that Lafreniere hasn’t gotten the opportunities like a lot of other kids do because we have to win also and that the veterans in front of him on the LW are the guys they rely on to do that.

    Panarin has been awful. He has done more harm than good to this team since game one of last year, outside of the OT goal. How about demoting Artemi at 5v5 and on the PP so that one of the kids actually gets a chance? Even Filip Chytil, who has basically been our best forward, sees basically zero PP time. Why is it so difficult to see that something isn’t working and make a change?

    Like why not just literally try something like this for a stretch of ten+ games, since we already suck ass:

    Kreider, Zibanejad, Kakko

    Lafreniere, Trocheck, Kravtsov

    Panarin, Chytil, Goodrow

    Whatever fucking bums we have plus Gauthier

    PP1: Zibanejad, Trocheck, Kreider, Lafreniere, Fox

    PP2: Panarin, Chytil, Kravtsov, MILLER and SCHNEIDER instead of Trouba since Zac Jones is gone for now

    SPLIT the units up to give the opposing team different looks. I know I’m talking crazy here.

  3. SportingWallaby

    The fact that this clown isn’t fired already is enough for me to be over drury as well. Buchnevich trade was bad but I was willing to give him more rope. But at this point he is just as responsible for this teams woes too.

Write A Comment

Pin