@Devils du New Jersey

Mailbag: Devils en tant que destination commerciale de Patrick Kane; Le plus gros problème des canards


Mailbag: Devils en tant que destination commerciale de Patrick Kane; Le plus gros problème des canards


MK2_VW

10 Comments

  1. thoughtful-hippo

    Trading Mercer for a few months of Patrick Kane would be insanity.

  2. NJDevs26

    Sounds like a fun idea, but Kane is technically a rental with an expiring contract and Fitz is on record saying he is looking for the opposite in a trade deadline deal. That’s not to say it can’t happen though, it just seems unlikely

  3. ghostOfGigantor

    Mercer is not going anywhere

  4. armchaircommanderdad

    I laughed really hard at the suggestion of Mercer.

    Sure a young team breaking out should trade away one of those foundational arts for… one playoffs run the year they breakout.

    Hard ducking no there. Muk and a second as a rental.

    If it’s a sign and trade that price can go up. He’s 34 and has gas in the tank but how much? Maybe 2 years?

    Their time to push to trade him for a haul was a few years ago, not as he is expiring as a rental.

  5. Audi_R8_

    I’m glad the author acknowledged it’s a bad idea and was just talking about it for fun, but I agree with him and everybody else that it’s ridiculous.

    Imagine paying blue chip prices for a 34 year old who would be our 6th best player

  6. NiceSockBro

    yeah we don’t need to rush, we have a good team and trading away some of those young studs for a shot at one year isn’t worth it. kane should be a target of a team like the islanders or Vegas that NEED to win now because they’re facing a massive rebuild in the near future

  7. TheTechManager

    Kane is 34…no fracking way would I give up Mercer and a draft draft pick. We’re in really good shape as is. Let the kids keep playing

  8. PFalcone33

    Do we need him? Team is doing fine right now. I know Kane is good but we got a good thing going already.

Write A Comment

Pin