Trading Mercer for a few months of Patrick Kane would be insanity.
NJDevs26
Sounds like a fun idea, but Kane is technically a rental with an expiring contract and Fitz is on record saying he is looking for the opposite in a trade deadline deal. That’s not to say it can’t happen though, it just seems unlikely
I laughed really hard at the suggestion of Mercer.
Sure a young team breaking out should trade away one of those foundational arts for… one playoffs run the year they breakout.
Hard ducking no there. Muk and a second as a rental.
If it’s a sign and trade that price can go up. He’s 34 and has gas in the tank but how much? Maybe 2 years?
Their time to push to trade him for a haul was a few years ago, not as he is expiring as a rental.
Audi_R8_
I’m glad the author acknowledged it’s a bad idea and was just talking about it for fun, but I agree with him and everybody else that it’s ridiculous.
Imagine paying blue chip prices for a 34 year old who would be our 6th best player
NiceSockBro
yeah we don’t need to rush, we have a good team and trading away some of those young studs for a shot at one year isn’t worth it. kane should be a target of a team like the islanders or Vegas that NEED to win now because they’re facing a massive rebuild in the near future
TheTechManager
Kane is 34…no fracking way would I give up Mercer and a draft draft pick. We’re in really good shape as is. Let the kids keep playing
PFalcone33
Do we need him? Team is doing fine right now. I know Kane is good but we got a good thing going already.
10 Comments
Please no Patrick Kane.
Trading Mercer for a few months of Patrick Kane would be insanity.
Sounds like a fun idea, but Kane is technically a rental with an expiring contract and Fitz is on record saying he is looking for the opposite in a trade deadline deal. That’s not to say it can’t happen though, it just seems unlikely
https://cdn.ponly.com/wp-content/uploads/No-Memes-15.jpg
Mercer is not going anywhere
I laughed really hard at the suggestion of Mercer.
Sure a young team breaking out should trade away one of those foundational arts for… one playoffs run the year they breakout.
Hard ducking no there. Muk and a second as a rental.
If it’s a sign and trade that price can go up. He’s 34 and has gas in the tank but how much? Maybe 2 years?
Their time to push to trade him for a haul was a few years ago, not as he is expiring as a rental.
I’m glad the author acknowledged it’s a bad idea and was just talking about it for fun, but I agree with him and everybody else that it’s ridiculous.
Imagine paying blue chip prices for a 34 year old who would be our 6th best player
yeah we don’t need to rush, we have a good team and trading away some of those young studs for a shot at one year isn’t worth it. kane should be a target of a team like the islanders or Vegas that NEED to win now because they’re facing a massive rebuild in the near future
Kane is 34…no fracking way would I give up Mercer and a draft draft pick. We’re in really good shape as is. Let the kids keep playing
Do we need him? Team is doing fine right now. I know Kane is good but we got a good thing going already.