Whatever happen, I’m worried about taking Michkov. I hope we get to pick way higher then #6.
benfoldy
Interesting they don’t rate dvorsky at all
42yop
I love Michkov and would be thrilled if we could get him at 6, but I’ll be disappointed if we leave without a potential 1C. We really need a top 3 pick
Burgergold
Two winger :/
BlazeOfGlory72
While I know you shouldn’t draft for position, it would feel like a missed opportunity to not walk out with a centre if we had two top 10 picks. We’d have Caufield, Dach, Slafkovsky, Mitchkov, Sale and Mesar at wing, but only Suzuki at centre. It would be a very weirdly balanced team unless we make some trades.
FluffyMcFluffen
Crazy that Michkov is falling this far in the draft. They guy should be #2 based on talent alone.
On his last international tournament (u18), he was absolutely spectacular and went toe to toe (and sometime looked better) than Bédard
bcgrappler
In a C heavy draft, I cNt see us not leaving with 1.
7 Comments
Whatever happen, I’m worried about taking Michkov. I hope we get to pick way higher then #6.
Interesting they don’t rate dvorsky at all
I love Michkov and would be thrilled if we could get him at 6, but I’ll be disappointed if we leave without a potential 1C. We really need a top 3 pick
Two winger :/
While I know you shouldn’t draft for position, it would feel like a missed opportunity to not walk out with a centre if we had two top 10 picks. We’d have Caufield, Dach, Slafkovsky, Mitchkov, Sale and Mesar at wing, but only Suzuki at centre. It would be a very weirdly balanced team unless we make some trades.
Crazy that Michkov is falling this far in the draft. They guy should be #2 based on talent alone.
On his last international tournament (u18), he was absolutely spectacular and went toe to toe (and sometime looked better) than Bédard
In a C heavy draft, I cNt see us not leaving with 1.