Steve Dangle récapitule et analyse le match 43 de la saison des Maple Leafs de Toronto contre les Red Wings de Detroit. COMMANDITAIRE : https://sportsinteraction.com/sdpn SDPN : https://www.sdpn.ca/ SDPN DISCORD : https://discord.com/invite/MtTmw9rrz7 LIVRE : https://bit.ly/2I9hmWP LIVRE AUDIO : https://bit.ly/2GIgYya SCEAU DE PÂQUES : https://bit.ly/3vcBVug
@Red Wings de Détroit
39 Comments
I think Steve has the "already in the crease" versus "skating towards the net" backwards. In the crease (thus limiting the goalie) should be the worse situation.
Buddy kicked puck to his stick and it hit off Detroit player and in the net. I've seen similar plays/goals in other games and it would count… Rules are interpreted on a nightly bases. I don't care about this game but playoffs come…
I needed a post-loss LFR today, thanks Detroit!
Even as a Wings fan I thought that goal should have counted and felt bad for McMann. But I am sure as hell glad it didn’t lol
Brad Hunt counter? That's a Dang It.
They are going to win on Saturday because aren't we better than a kraken
They don't really have a number 1 goalie. Maybe he should have started Murray
Wings have a real tough road to travel if they're going to get a wild card spot. Good to get two more points and a second win. #LGRW
Leafs legend Brad hunt. Oh Steve the laughs you give me sometimes 😂
#givestevesstuffback
Eff the "rules" McMann's goal counted.
NO GOAL: The "spirit" of that rule was 100% about player safety, nothing else. IMHO, I don't even think players should be allowed to angle their skates to deflect the puck in the net. If I had my way, any puck that goes in the net off an offensive players skate would not count ever. You do not want to create situations where players may be encouraged in any small way to use his skates to score a goal so that they never kick near the goalie who may be, and quite often is in a vulnerable position. The changed "icing" ffs and they will still allow players to use razor sharp blades to score goals.
That probably should've been a goal, but I can't get too upset about the league having consistency for once.
Perfect – you laid out like 10 excuses why the Leafs lost like a true Leafs fan. Just pull out the excuses rolodex in the playoffs again this year. McMann if you read the rules NO GOAL Steve – let's be honest here.
As a Wings fan, I didn't know how to feel as we're usually fucked over by officiating and I didn't know this is what it felt like.
At this point, I don't buy into any conspiracy theories because officiating is so blatantly incompetent, they couldn't force an agenda one way or the other.
Do I think those calls cost you all the game? Probably not, Wings likely would have won regardless, but it is a shame officiating is such a deciding factor.
It's always nice to see the leafs lose, but that's mostly jealousy as I really appreciate how the team is built. I love the SDPN crew, so if the Leafs do make it out of the first round, I just hope Steve, Adam, and Jesse are happy.
I feel like if this call was against Detroit, it would have got a “sorry for your luck but rules are rules!!!” Instead of a 20 minute moment by moment breakdown!!!
Isn't it Dryden Hunt?
This was the fuel needed to propel me through a Friday at the end of a long week.
As a wings fan, I would agree with the refereeing being quite subpar last night. I noticed the second time around watching highlights and recaps that they missed a high sticking call and some others were fairly weak. I also fully agree about the Walman penalty, even if it isn't a trip a collision like that is gonna get called for something 95/100 times. However, I would argue that if your idea about the disallowed goal were ever considered or implemented then it would just reintroduce all of the things that the original rule aimed to prevent with the target now more dangerously being other players instead of the net. Imho, this goal is the rare exception to a problem that has been effectively coached into extinction, and tweaking things to allow this goal to count just opens the door for it to be done on purpose, which feels to me to be equally "un-hockey."
can we get steve his fucking belongings back? what the fuck?
Hi Steve, bruins fan Nate here. Plz dont jinx them 😅😅 (love the vids, watch all the time just for the screams 😂)
Steve is there any way you can get your back stuff??? That's kinda messed up for you!
Kicked the puck to his stick. Was hit. Then it hit skate of other player. Due to the momentum, the play should have counted. As for if he wasn't hit, he would have shot it in the net. Lame rule.
For the kicking puck, that Blues game this season where the guy kicked it down the ice to the goal, but had to wait for another player with a stick to score the goal
The Leafs are still as inconsistent as they ever were; they won't win many games giving up 4 goals, and it could have been 7 or 8. Dubas has had years to sort out the goaltending and defense, but he hasn't; the goaltending isn't as good and the defense is shaky. If Dubas gets a contract extension, we can expect this shite for another few seasons.
Fabbri "kicking" the stick that was dropped I think was mostly unavoidable. The stick was just dropped and was still flying around. That stick was by no means just sitting there not moving, it was still spinning around when it hit Fabbri. Plus, look at Fabbri, he's not even looking in that direction and is in the process of turning towards the goal. No kicking motion at all, heck, he not even really skating as he's just gliding.
Now if the stick wasn't helicoptering around after the Leaf lost his stick (butter fingers by the way) and was just laying on the ice and our guy "moved" it out of the way with intent (it's in the rule book, can't INTENTIONALLY move an "active" stick), then yea, that'll be called. But in this case where a guy can't hold onto his stick and it goes flying off right into another player that happens to be on the other team isn't a penalty. The number of sticks that are dropped and fly off hitting other players on the other team is very common. That Leaf needs to hold onto his stick.
The reason that you are not allowed to kick the puck into the net but you can anywhere else is that it’s legal for someone to grab the puck with their hands in front of the goal and not anywhere else. It’s part of protecting the goalie.
Oh, and while it was the second of a back to back for Toronto, can you really call that "travel" in between? It's like a 4 hour (at tops with poor traffic) car ride. The trip to my own cottage in Michigan is further than this, and I'm in my own state.
Funny how whenever the Leafs win it seems to be because of the officiating, according to their fanbase. So sad.
Two referees two linesmen can’t get it right ever
Why does drunk boy Sheldon Keefe hate Connor Timmins ?
Can’t see any reason for keeping Dryden “Brad” Hunt in the lineup over Bobby McMann.
The argument Steve is making at 13:00 is dumb because it is accounted for in the rules. He states, "where should the line be drawn… what if someone intentionally kicks the puck into their own net". This is accounted for in the rules. The reason this goal was called back was because he kicked the puck and it was DEFLECTED into the net non intentionally. If maata were to have made a kicking motion himself and kicked it into the net it would have counted and that was what they were looking for on the replay.
Imo the no kicking to score rule is to prevent knife shoes flying around near the goalie. The goalie has to put his hands on the ground to cover it. The LAST thing you want is players trying to kick it in the crease and hit the goalies wrist
Big surprise Morgan is back and the leafs are loosing again! Seen this movie before! Another down the shit hole.🙄🤷
2nd goal Fabbri didnt move his feet at all he glided into a stick that should have been in kerfoots hands in the first place, not flying across the ice.
As a NJ Devils fan, I was dying laughing at the no goal and ensuing fans losing their shit about the rule.
The important distinction about kicking for a goal and kicking down the ice: the goaltender's face. Now, perhaps there's an argument that the rule should be worded more along the lines of "don't kick the puck anywhere near the blue paint" but that was always my logic for why you wouldn't be able to kick the puck in but be able to kick it anywhere else.
I haven’t quite nailed down the Maple Leafs formula for wins and losses …but seeing as how we just lost to the lowly redwings I’d say we are almost sure to beat the powerhouse Bruins. 🤔