Pour ceux d’entre nous qui se demandent qui remporte réellement un choix de première ronde
—
wherethestreet
@Blues de Saint-Louis
Pour ceux d’entre nous qui se demandent qui remporte réellement un choix de première ronde
—
wherethestreet
6 Comments
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.sportingnews.com/ca/nhl/news/nhl-trade-deadline-first-round-picks-history-rumors-news-market-tracker/1h85s6s94cbxx1qoooczvsk7tf](https://www.sportingnews.com/ca/nhl/news/nhl-trade-deadline-first-round-picks-history-rumors-news-market-tracker/1h85s6s94cbxx1qoooczvsk7tf)**
*****
^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
If we leave the trade deadline with just one more first round pick gained from trading expiring contracts I’d be happy tbh
If Army can’t get a first, based on history, for 90 or 91 then he can’t be the GM anymore.
I’d be happy with a switch in coaching.
Should get 1st+ for ROR and maybe tarasenko but 1st minimum. Acciari/Barbashev should return 2nds each (at minimum in Barbys case). Mikkola maybe a 2nd if we find a sucker looking for a big, physical dman.
From this, it looks like we’re definitely getting 1sts + for each of ROR and Tarasenko. Could probably add a later pick to Barby to get another 1st too. Cuz some of those names in the article were uh, not good.