Le format de l’article décrit un ancien joueur que chaque équipe souhaite avoir en ce moment
—
JJL65
@Canadiens de Montréal
Le format de l’article décrit un ancien joueur que chaque équipe souhaite avoir en ce moment
—
JJL65
14 Comments
But…..we would not be close to the playoff picture even with him? It would likely just get us a worse pick. It doesn’t make any sense. I love Danault and wish him the best, but it was clear he wanted a change, so he left, and I hold nothing against him.
edit: he also is not a top-line centre lol
Thats as cold as a take I’ve read
« Philippe Danault is great, Habs would be better with him »
31 teams would be better with Danault in their ranks
Si on avait garder Danault on aurait sûrement pas passé par une reconstruction pi on resterait dans le mode « équipe moyenne »
MB fucked up real bad with this one but at the same time if we kept Danault we would not have had such a bad season and would not have entered a rebuild mode. So in the end it might have been a good move.
Still pissed though but Beck is gonna make us forget about Danault sooner than later.
Please stop
Keeping danault was gonna be disastrous for us. Basically untradeable because of the length on the contract, the team wouldn’t be bad enough to draft high and wouldn’t be good enough to make the playoffs. Bad take from Athletrash as always.
What the heck. Danault is an obvious etablished 2C, he’s not even 1C on kings he’s behind Kopitar. He’s also on his usual 50-55 points pace and he got PP time now. He’s a top 2 way center but he’s not a top line center. He’s lacking offense to be one. He’s overrated since he left montreal
I’d rather have DUBOIS
If Danault was putting up these numbers in a Habs jersey no one would say hes a 1st line center. Watch the english media act like PLD is a bum once he comes over.
i dont think the org let him go because they didnt think he was a good enough player, they let him go because paying enough to keep him here would be counter productive for both parties.
we needed to be bad, and he most likely has a desire to win
But what player left through free agency that they would have been better off to keep over Danault?
Really don’t understand this at all, we’ve committed to the rebuild why the heck would we have a need for Danault right now. We need to accept where we stand and have to spend a couple years to see which one of our many prospects have what it takes. As much as I hate watching this team lose I do not want to see us rush things to try and contend, and end up making mistake by moving the wrong prospects to try and get a top end guy via trade or free agency.
I miss Phil… so much so that I now sometimes watch the Kings just to watch him play. Should have given him that 0.5mil extra and 2nd center spot
Did Danault’s agent write this lol?
Ya we all underestimated him when he was here but if he’s your top center you’re not winning anything.
In no world is Danault slotted above Suzuki.
If Danault and Suzuki swap teams the Habs would still be a dumpster. The Suzuki hate is ridiculous.