Dumb article. Why would we trade Elvis at his absolute lowest value? This shouldn’t even be a discussion until after the end of next season. If anything have tarasov come in and be the starter next year. Jackets don’t need the cap space for the foreseeable future so it’s better to see if he can rebound. He’s already looked better his last 5 or so games
CrazyLegLaFleur1
The only way I can see is trading Elvis is if the FO truly believes he needs a change of scenery and can find a team in a similar situation. I like Elvis and I hope he bounces back, but if he just can’t get it going here, it’s smart to move on before it gets too late.
I know another user on here proposed a Elvis for Demko swap. A move like this could make sense, as long as it didn’t cost too much.
The most likely is that we just stick with Elvis and hope for the bounce back, or he becomes a very expensive backup.
AlanLGuy
There’s no good outcome here. You either trade assets to dump Elvis, retain a ton of salary, or buy him out. All resulting in bad cap hits or sacrificing the teams future to get rid of what will likely be a very bad goalie contract. The best course is probably to stick with Elvis, hope he recovers his form down this last stretch and into next year.. and if not… well… Elvis becomes an overpaid backup and we ride Tarasov into what would be a very expensive RFA contract.
5 ways it doesn’t work out for us… one way it does.
Independent_Context4
no reason to move him now. let him play and then go through another off-season.
dougcbj
You can’t move him. There is no team in the NHL that would give up anything for him even at half his salary. Goalies like him are a dime a dozen, just because he has a big personality doesn’t make him good.
casperthegoth
Timing of the article is good with Elvis having played two pretty darn good games in a row.
Abush9527
I don’t think Elvis is going anywhere for the foreseeable future. I saw someone say to think of your goalies’ contracts together and he and Tarasov are about $6.5mil combined thru 24/25 season. That’s not that bad for a goalie tandem. Sure he’ll be an overpriced backup if Tarasov becomes the starter but it’s a hit i can live with for a bit and then buy him out or trade him when Tarasov gets a raise and then Elvis’ contract isn’t as bad of a hit. Ideally he figures everything out and becomes a #1 goalie (starting next season) but getting rid of him now doesn’t make a ton of sense to me
Degen_parlays
Elvis sucks. People are way to attached.
maz2305
So you trade him to Chicago for reichel? That way they will surely get to last place and win Bedard.
So win win without the expected NHL draft lottery intervention.
CBJ53
Why don’t we look at a new goalie coach? I think that would be a good first solution and a lot less expensive
10 Comments
Dumb article. Why would we trade Elvis at his absolute lowest value? This shouldn’t even be a discussion until after the end of next season. If anything have tarasov come in and be the starter next year. Jackets don’t need the cap space for the foreseeable future so it’s better to see if he can rebound. He’s already looked better his last 5 or so games
The only way I can see is trading Elvis is if the FO truly believes he needs a change of scenery and can find a team in a similar situation. I like Elvis and I hope he bounces back, but if he just can’t get it going here, it’s smart to move on before it gets too late.
I know another user on here proposed a Elvis for Demko swap. A move like this could make sense, as long as it didn’t cost too much.
The most likely is that we just stick with Elvis and hope for the bounce back, or he becomes a very expensive backup.
There’s no good outcome here. You either trade assets to dump Elvis, retain a ton of salary, or buy him out. All resulting in bad cap hits or sacrificing the teams future to get rid of what will likely be a very bad goalie contract. The best course is probably to stick with Elvis, hope he recovers his form down this last stretch and into next year.. and if not… well… Elvis becomes an overpaid backup and we ride Tarasov into what would be a very expensive RFA contract.
5 ways it doesn’t work out for us… one way it does.
no reason to move him now. let him play and then go through another off-season.
You can’t move him. There is no team in the NHL that would give up anything for him even at half his salary. Goalies like him are a dime a dozen, just because he has a big personality doesn’t make him good.
Timing of the article is good with Elvis having played two pretty darn good games in a row.
I don’t think Elvis is going anywhere for the foreseeable future. I saw someone say to think of your goalies’ contracts together and he and Tarasov are about $6.5mil combined thru 24/25 season. That’s not that bad for a goalie tandem. Sure he’ll be an overpriced backup if Tarasov becomes the starter but it’s a hit i can live with for a bit and then buy him out or trade him when Tarasov gets a raise and then Elvis’ contract isn’t as bad of a hit. Ideally he figures everything out and becomes a #1 goalie (starting next season) but getting rid of him now doesn’t make a ton of sense to me
Elvis sucks. People are way to attached.
So you trade him to Chicago for reichel? That way they will surely get to last place and win Bedard.
So win win without the expected NHL draft lottery intervention.
Why don’t we look at a new goalie coach? I think that would be a good first solution and a lot less expensive