@Blue Jackets de Columbus

[Friedman] Juste une idée qui me trotte dans la tête : Columbus déplace Gavrikov et utilise les actifs de retour pour essayer d’ajouter Chychrun. Ils ont déjà été intéressés par le D-man de l’Arizona et il a un mandat.


[Friedman] Juste une idée qui me trotte dans la tête : Columbus déplace Gavrikov et utilise les actifs de retour pour essayer d’ajouter Chychrun. Ils ont déjà été intéressés par le D-man de l’Arizona et il a un terme.


AstralTitan

9 Comments

  1. YRBThor19

    I think the growth of Mateychuk and Svozil have made Ceulemans a lot more tradeable than he was 6 or 7 months ago.

    So something around the newly acquired first, CC and Bemstrom possibly

  2. RonTugMyNuts

    Is it just me or does it not make sense to give up a bunch of assets for a player with 2 years of term when we’ll barely begin to be competing?

  3. Sployyy

    He’ll fit nicely with the rest of our oft-injured squad.

  4. Sloane_Kettering

    My hesitation is chychrun could take us out of bedard contention. It’s vital we get a top 3 pick this year

  5. CrazyLegLaFleur1

    Fuck it, let’s do it!

    Take the late 1st from the Gavy trade, add in a protected 24 1st, and Boqvist and see where it gets us. We have other sweeteners we could add if needed.

  6. mccurdy3

    Sounds really expensive for a few bumps upward.

  7. ftsteele

    We have one of the strongest D prospect pools in the NHL. Bet a kidney there is zero organizational interest in something like this.

  8. Imagine thinking you’re getting out of Arizona only to get dealt to Columbus?

  9. Adept_Indication3932

    He doesn’t fit long term plans of team likely wouldn’t resign. Trust process wait for our young D to mature

Write A Comment

Pin