We had 3 goals called back. Shoulda been a 4-1 game honestly (that second call was offside for sure)
treple13
I really feel like the rules interpretation needs to change. Regarding a puck being in the net it should be « best evidence » not « conclusive evidence ». On the other shot you see the puck in a similar position to this and appearing to be moving backwards (meaning it was further in the net). Maybe the solution is just not to have a « call on the ice ».
abrandnewsharpie
Parallax effect… Duh!
artisticflamesfan
even worse was the en goal by weegar
capitansorenson
Kelly Sutherland hates the flames( I know it’s Toronto’s fault) ref #11 in case you want to hate him later
CalgaryCheekClapper
See that one is clear as hell but the direct front angle is even more clear. How do u review this and still get it wrong? Is this call made by on ice refs or Toronto?
coyoteatemyhomework
The empty net goal was even more obvious (not offside) and not overturned… the flames dont need any help frustrating their fans!
Cautious-Weakness-54
Sharkies up 2-0 for any of you not glued to that game
Harby82
Wasn’t that the puck going in the net after the whistle? I think what they were looking at was before this no?
82-Aircooled
It’s in… again
Thaigerwould
It was in !-04
_sunburn
I mean if they called it no goal because of the push by lindy, fine. But straight up no goal? Fuck outta here
Longjumping-Limit827
Back to the past
dadbodthor19
It was in 04
joshkitty
Post this to R hockey with the offside call too!! call them out.
Dull-Economics-5229
Not to mention it was put in after this picture and waived off for no reason. Just terrible officiating tonight
Thumper86
Parallax!
*triggered*
Selmanella
nOT coNcLusIVe
Seanoton226
The refs were terrible in this game, missed calls on both teams. Was losing my mind watching it.
Saamov1
Literally 2004
Macksterr24
Yeah…that’s a goal
No clue what the refs were on
Crititcalhits22
Yeah I see, there’s Foot was in the crease no goal.
Ginger-Beefcake
Why are you blaming the refs on something that was decided by the war room?
24 Comments
Saw this on CP. Refs are a joke
We had 3 goals called back. Shoulda been a 4-1 game honestly (that second call was offside for sure)
I really feel like the rules interpretation needs to change. Regarding a puck being in the net it should be « best evidence » not « conclusive evidence ». On the other shot you see the puck in a similar position to this and appearing to be moving backwards (meaning it was further in the net). Maybe the solution is just not to have a « call on the ice ».
Parallax effect… Duh!
even worse was the en goal by weegar
Kelly Sutherland hates the flames( I know it’s Toronto’s fault) ref #11 in case you want to hate him later
See that one is clear as hell but the direct front angle is even more clear. How do u review this and still get it wrong? Is this call made by on ice refs or Toronto?
The empty net goal was even more obvious (not offside) and not overturned… the flames dont need any help frustrating their fans!
Sharkies up 2-0 for any of you not glued to that game
Wasn’t that the puck going in the net after the whistle? I think what they were looking at was before this no?
It’s in… again
It was in !-04
I mean if they called it no goal because of the push by lindy, fine. But straight up no goal? Fuck outta here
Back to the past
It was in 04
Post this to R hockey with the offside call too!! call them out.
Not to mention it was put in after this picture and waived off for no reason. Just terrible officiating tonight
Parallax!
*triggered*
nOT coNcLusIVe
The refs were terrible in this game, missed calls on both teams. Was losing my mind watching it.
Literally 2004
Yeah…that’s a goal
No clue what the refs were on
Yeah I see, there’s Foot was in the crease no goal.
Why are you blaming the refs on something that was decided by the war room?