@Canucks de Vancouver

Sportsnet avec une proposition d’accord à trois qui favorise vraiment les canucks


Sportsnet avec une proposition d’accord à trois qui favorise vraiment les canucks


yosoo

26 Comments

  1. Ngl I’d do it, probably other 2 teams won’t. It’s just a fantasy anyway!

  2. SackofLlamas

    Man this is up there with that Marner for Miller trade in terms of boneheaded nonsense. I enjoy J.T. Miller but he is absolutely, 100% more of what the Leafs already have and not a solution to any of their problems. So not only do they get bled on age, value and contract efficiency, they’re not even gaining anything back by way of intangibles.

    Of course Dubas is apparently on his way out and Chiarelli and Benning are unemployed so anything is possible.

  3. nihilism_ftw

    > « it sort of felt like the Canucks wanted a take-back »

    Just because most fans have no clue what value Miller brings to the table doesn’t mean that our management also doesn’t lol

  4. 21marvel1

    The only thing holding me back is the lack of C coming back… ahhhhh but Nylander would be so good with Pettersson …but ahhhh the C depth would be way too thin and there isn’t any real options on the FA market that we could afford to fill that 2C spot.

  5. Upbeat_Trainer

    Who’s our 2c then? Nylander is also due for a raise and there’s going to be no savings from the Miller contract. I wouldn’t mind Nylander playing with Petey, but it creates other problems.

    Not to mention that we already have a shitload of wingers, many of which we’re trying to get rid of.

  6. JT is exactly what the leafs need- a guy that would drag them into the fight because mitchy is too scared

  7. metrichustle

    Nylander Petey Kuzy. Sounds good to me

  8. NotaRussianChabot

    This looks very lopsided but then you remember how bad that Matt Murray contract is.

  9. CrabBeanie

    Miller has « outer-rim Selke consideration… two way style… »

    The snarky reply basically writes itself.

  10. TheWeakestLink1

    This doesn’t address Vancouver’s needs for a 2C. I think the only option for Vancouver to get a 2C deal is to send nylander to Chicago instead. Since Chicago doesn’t have a good center to offer, I think the only way for this to work is if they offer a 1st round pick in this year’s draft so Vancouver can select a 2C.

  11. Faldarian

    Another winger and a 3rd pairing D. Those are the two positions we have so many of we should be trying to shed.

    What we need most is a top-4 RHD, and middle six center.

  12. CaptainIndoCanadian

    This obviously won’t happen as much as we’d love to, but the fact that opposing teams are willing to do this has me hyped lmao. What other eliminated team can we take advantage of?! Give us Laffy and K’andre NYR!!!

  13. JGibbons151

    I follow both teams closely and wouldn’t mind this from either side. Sure, the Canucks win this deal but the leafs could do worse than adding a guy like Miller. The only concern with Nylander would be what kind of money he might want as a UFA. Still think the Canucks should do this if it were ever an option.

  14. DaMonstaburg

    This would be a great trade and might’ve been considered if not for Nylander being the only Leaf on ice during Round 2 who wanted to win that series.

  15. JerbearCuddles

    Nylander is another soft, one-way scoring winger. We have plenty of those. Not to mention, he’s a UFA next summer. Miller is locked up on a good contract, can play center, has been a point per game guy his entire time here, and plays with an edge. Without Miller, we’re literally the softest team in the league.

  16. avmp629

    For starters there’s no need to have this be a 3-way trade, it feels like it’s just a 3-way deal because those are in vogue right now

    That is terrible value for both Nylander and Liljegren

    Matt Murray has a 10-team no-trade list and one of the worst teams in the league is likely on it

  17. skorvat

    Anyone who wouldn’t do this deal is out of their mind. There is good value in just getting out of Miller’s deal, let alone getting back a talent like Nylander and an RHD in Liljegren.

  18. joeyandkuma

    Why would we need another winger of which we have many of the same mould also leaves a gap at c2 makes no sense

  19. Semprovictus

    Problem I have here is the contract amounts don’t line up, and then we have a significant hole in our 2c and 3c spots with no room to move

  20. Jazzlike_Kick_5434

    I think the only way this happens is if MLSE replaces Dubas with Hextall.

  21. Spookedchicken

    I’d say yes and hang up to call the NHL head office the moment that offer is made to me before the Leafs change their mind. That would be an unequivocal fleecing by us it’s not even funny.

Write A Comment

Pin