@Canucks de Vancouver

Si vous étiez le directeur général des Canucks, quelle offre réaliste feriez-vous pour Alexis Lafrenière?


https://www.foreverblueshirts.com/rangers-rumors-canucks-alexis-lafreniere/ Selon cet article, les Canucks sont toujours intéressés par Alexis Lafreniere. Je suis curieux de savoir ce que les fans des Canucks pensent de la juste valeur. De plus, Lafrenière est un RFA et doit signer un nouveau contrat cet été. Les Rangers sont serrés contre le cap, avec quelques décisions à prendre. Vous pourriez même ne pas vouloir Laf, ce qui est juste.


AAfreakinRON

42 Comments

  1. mephnick

    I’m still not sure what we could offer NYR.

    They probably don’t care about picks and our prospects are worse than Laf. The kid line produces pretty well for cheap and trading them for Miller would probably harm their depth too much at too big a cap cost.

    Miller before he signed his extension sure made a lot more sense…

  2. NerdPunch

    Im sure not everyone will agree but I would be open to trading the 11th overall pick for Lafreniere

    Depending on who is available at 11th of course.

    If Dvorsky/Benson/Michkov caliber players are there, then no.

    But if you’re looking at Cristall/Perrault/Sale and that tier of player, definitely shop the pick if you don’t like what you see.

  3. TheGreatestKaTet

    Isn’t Laf another slow winger? We don’t really need more of those

  4. gambierisland

    I dont see the appeal in Laf beyond the pedigree. He had ZERO points in the playoffs this year and would be another slow player on an already slow team.

  5. Solitude_09

    Lafreniere needs to land somewhere he can get top six minutes. He would be a solid option behind Kuzmenko on the second line if the Canucks were looking to take a gamble. I just don’t see what they can offer NY without having to overpay.

  6. Strict-Caterpillar38

    Laf needs to play in the top six consistently to really take a step forward I think, so the Canucks would need to dump a top six winger or two to make room (we already have guys like Boeser and Garland playing 3rd line a lot of the time), and the Rangers can’t afford to take any of them. It’s tricky with both teams against the cap, and with wingers being the least of the Canucks’ needs. I’d be excited to add him though.

  7. brodiefilm

    It’s such a difficult trade, Lafreniere’s draft pedigree means NYR will want high value back but any team acquiring him will want to hedge bets. I think it’ll be an asking-price-too-high, offer-price-too-low situation until he becomes a UFA (which I believe is after this next RFA contract?)

    But who knows how hockey minds work… look at Nail Yakupov as a former 1OA trade: after 3 seasons with Edmonton he had 88 points (Laf has 91 after 3 seasons). By the end of Year 4 he had 111 points and was let go for an ECHL player and conditional 3rd. If Lafreniere has another down year, NYR could do a fire sale to recoup something before he walks? We can dream.

  8. ubcthrowaway-01

    At 20 years old, he’s in a solid position, but I’d only be for it, if it means he’s on a bridge deal and we don’t give up too much in terms of assets.

    No way are we paying him Stutzle type money

  9. timothyrobin

    There’s too much risk to trade a high pick for Lafreniere. He could be worth it, but the risk that he’s nothing more than an average middle-six winger is real.

    The maximum I’d go for right now is a Hoglander for Lafreniere swap.

  10. -GregTheGreat-

    The issue with Lafrieniere is that he doesn’t really fit a need of ours. What we would be comfortable offering and what the NYR would be comfortable taking is two different ballparks. His value as a former 1st overall pick is far too high for being a project player.

    In terms of offers, the highest I would feel comfortable going is something like Hoglander, a 3rd, and a B prospect or mid-late pick(s). Which would not be anywhere near enough IMO.

  11. avmp629

    I would probably go as high as a 2nd round pick, or a B-level prospect and some conditional picks based on performance. I doubt the Rangers bite on that

  12. Strict-Caterpillar38

    People have mentioned a deal built around Hoglander+ for Lafreniere. Would people also entertain a deal built around Podkolzin+?

    Laf definitely has more offensive upside, but Podz can potentially still become an effective bottom six PK guy if the offense never materializes. I think Laf might be top-six, first-unit PP or bust kind of player, so he’s higher risk/reward.

  13. cascadiacurmedgeon

    O.E.L. and a storage container full of unsold Messier merchandise… maybe future considerations as well

  14. OutlawCountryFan

    Nothing, let the Habs take him

  15. SIIP00

    Hoglander or Podz +2nd rounder and something else. Maybe a future top 10 protected first.

  16. azialsilvara

    I wouldn’t, if I’m offering up large assets I’d be poking around the 3OA

  17. YouCanFucough

    Hear me out, what if we trade Andrei Kuzmenko.

    The Rangers have an obsession with adding star level players with great counting stats to their lineup, and they’re in a win right-the-fuck-now position. They can’t afford to take their time with Laf and Kakko and hope they have a breakout any day now.

    Kuzmenko has 2 years at a super reasonable cap hit. If he lives up to it and scores 39 goals again this year and the year after, he’s getting over $10M anywhere he wants. Even if he wanted to stay here after putting up numbers like that, we might not be able to afford him, and at 30 years old I don’t know if we should.

    If we trade Kuz with retention we’re not just getting Laf, we’re getting Laf and a 1st. A 1st that this management would love to flip for more stuff.

  18. MRFINEWINE1

    Nothing. What do they need him for

  19. julesieee

    Another bust like Kravstov.

    Don’t you dare touch our Hög. 🐷

  20. MacLogical

    Don’t really want him especially for what it would probably cost

  21. Decent-Box5009

    Yeah I’d just pass on him. Rather keep the pieces we have than trade for him.

  22. JGibbons151

    Kuzmenko would make sense. He’s a big improvement for the rangers in the short term and the Canucks might not want to pay him what he’s worth in two more years anyway on a UFA contract. Lafreniere would be worth taking a swing on in that situation if you ask me.

  23. NoProof

    I’d rather have Kakko. 5on5 machine with good defensive play. Guy would get 60+ points if he was on PP1

  24. Iamacanuck18

    11 overall pick and garland

  25. HighburyOnStrand

    None.

    We don’t need wingers.

  26. Green-Win-8897

    Maybe we could offer them a lifetime supply of Timbits and Poutine?

  27. PaperweightCoaster

    NYR would ask too much and we should not offer much. Draft pedigree aside, I don’t want another poor skater riding on hopes and dreams. Don’t see it happening.

  28. > Rangers are tight against the cap, with some decisions to make.

    Sounds familiar. We simply don’t have any space to take on more salary. I don’t think moving an expiring contract in the Giraffe for a contract with equal value but with term is a good idea either.

  29. swainsauce89

    Rathbone, Boeser, Garland for Laff and NYR 1st

    Idk. Just spitballing.

  30. Successful-Pea-9557

    Would Hoglander, Rathbone and a mid pick get it done?

  31. skorvat

    > **If** the two sides are at an impasse over his upcoming contract, **I believe** it’s **possible** he **could** be moved and the Canucks are a **likely** destination. **Some** even **speculated** Brock Boeser as the main piece coming back.

    Holy fuck this article gave me second hand cancer. This is journalism in 2023, everyone. Even titles it, “Canucks want Lafreniere”, and goes through the whole article speculating everything.

  32. SourGrapesFTW

    Rathbone and Beauvillier for Lafreniere

    See what Laf wants for his new deal, might end up being a cap-neutral move. I’d give him a 2 year x 4.5 million deal and call it a day. We would keep him an RFA at the expiry of his bridge deal.

    There’s no way that we could get him to sign a cheap 6 or 7 year deal. Cap is going up and he’s going to keep on improving.

  33. Redlight0516

    Lockwood and a 7th.

    This trade doesn’t happen.

    Rangers want what you’d trade to get a first round pick. Canucks want the price you pay for a high-upside gamble on a player who has lost value and needs a change of scenery. I will be absolutely shocked if this happens.

  34. LeftToaster

    I’ve proposed this a couple of times; I think it works for both teams.

    To Vancouver: Alexis Lafrenier and NYR 2023 first round pick (23rd overall)

    To NY Rangers: Canucks 2023 first round pick (11th OA) and Brock Boeser.

  35. Still-Data9119

    Boesr plus Joe Anjur probs

  36. joeyandkuma

    great just what we need another slow, soft winger. lol

    we need D, we need more grit and size.

  37. enterthedragonpunch

    No more project players. Please.

Write A Comment

Pin