@Flames de Calgary

Rumblings à propos de l’accord « Blockbuster » entre les flammes et les requins


C’est une rumeur commerciale tellement stupide qui a mis un flair de merde dessus à la place d’un flair de rumeur commerciale. Mais ça a été lent ici ces derniers temps alors j’ai pensé que j’allais l’animer.


cgydan

8 Comments

  1. Melodic-Bug-9022

    Can people stop using this site as a source for rumors? It’s not remotely accurate.

  2. MostLikelyDenim

    Will save you the click on the shitty website.

    > There are some rumblings around the league that suggest that the Flames have offered Elias Lindholm and Daniel Vladar in exchange for Logan Couture and highly regarded prospect William Eklund.

    Can’t remember what insider mentioned this weeks and weeks ago, but the rumour was that it was turned down on the Flames side.

  3. POLANPOLANPOLAN

    Why are you posting stuff from this site?

  4. zzKURUPTzz

    Conroy should resign if this is what happens.

  5. flyin_italian

    Lindholm for about tree-fiddy

  6. Rulebreaker15

    Lol. The only “Blockbuster” trade Sharks could do would be closer to the bankrupt, failed video rental business definition of the word, not the lower case version. Stupid speculation.

  7. Pang1Tong

    Only talking as an hypothetical. Even if this could be a possibility. I would prefer to add as well with Eklund is Eetu Makiniemi (goaltender) on top as Calgary’s 3rd/4th stringer.

  8. Chemical_Signal2753

    If the Flames traded Lindholm for picks and prospects I could see them acquiring Couture from San Jose or Kuznetsov from Washington. With that said this trade makes no sense, giving up Lindholm and Vladar, and taking on a cap dump in Couture, to only get Eklund back seems like a terrible deal.

Write A Comment

Pin