Rumblings à propos de l’accord « Blockbuster » entre les flammes et les requins
C’est une rumeur commerciale tellement stupide qui a mis un flair de merde dessus à la place d’un flair de rumeur commerciale. Mais ça a été lent ici ces derniers temps alors j’ai pensé que j’allais l’animer.
Can people stop using this site as a source for rumors? It’s not remotely accurate.
MostLikelyDenim
Will save you the click on the shitty website.
> There are some rumblings around the league that suggest that the Flames have offered Elias Lindholm and Daniel Vladar in exchange for Logan Couture and highly regarded prospect William Eklund.
Can’t remember what insider mentioned this weeks and weeks ago, but the rumour was that it was turned down on the Flames side.
POLANPOLANPOLAN
Why are you posting stuff from this site?
zzKURUPTzz
Conroy should resign if this is what happens.
flyin_italian
Lindholm for about tree-fiddy
Rulebreaker15
Lol. The only “Blockbuster” trade Sharks could do would be closer to the bankrupt, failed video rental business definition of the word, not the lower case version. Stupid speculation.
Pang1Tong
Only talking as an hypothetical. Even if this could be a possibility. I would prefer to add as well with Eklund is Eetu Makiniemi (goaltender) on top as Calgary’s 3rd/4th stringer.
Chemical_Signal2753
If the Flames traded Lindholm for picks and prospects I could see them acquiring Couture from San Jose or Kuznetsov from Washington. With that said this trade makes no sense, giving up Lindholm and Vladar, and taking on a cap dump in Couture, to only get Eklund back seems like a terrible deal.
8 Comments
Can people stop using this site as a source for rumors? It’s not remotely accurate.
Will save you the click on the shitty website.
> There are some rumblings around the league that suggest that the Flames have offered Elias Lindholm and Daniel Vladar in exchange for Logan Couture and highly regarded prospect William Eklund.
Can’t remember what insider mentioned this weeks and weeks ago, but the rumour was that it was turned down on the Flames side.
Why are you posting stuff from this site?
Conroy should resign if this is what happens.
Lindholm for about tree-fiddy
Lol. The only “Blockbuster” trade Sharks could do would be closer to the bankrupt, failed video rental business definition of the word, not the lower case version. Stupid speculation.
Only talking as an hypothetical. Even if this could be a possibility. I would prefer to add as well with Eklund is Eetu Makiniemi (goaltender) on top as Calgary’s 3rd/4th stringer.
If the Flames traded Lindholm for picks and prospects I could see them acquiring Couture from San Jose or Kuznetsov from Washington. With that said this trade makes no sense, giving up Lindholm and Vladar, and taking on a cap dump in Couture, to only get Eklund back seems like a terrible deal.