I think its gotta be Nick, but only by 1-3 pts overall.
Gotta figure Nicks got the advantage on passing, physicality, defense and durability. Caufiled might win on shooting but Suzuki is still damn good at that.
meowpeh
Haven’t played any NHL games in a while so my rating will probably be off, but I can see a world where they both have an 88 rating
ScareCrow13-
Suzuki 89 / Caufield 87
Caufield will lack in too many stats, physical is 1/3 of the stats.
symbiotespiderham
What did Miller say at the end?
crissdecaliss
I love these videos
looking_fordopamine
Suzuki should be 88 or 89, and caufield, being honest he’s great but he can be as low as 87 and as high as 91, hot take but he’s got great potential, if he had a full season with 46 goals, which could’ve likely been 50 goals he’d be a 89+
crissdecaliss
Gonna be Suzuki by a close margin, followed by Caufield and Matheson.
11 Comments
Caufield of course.
Carey Price
Zooks
[Farrell first guy to say Caufield, they’ve known each other since US development team 😁](https://twitter.com/colecaufield/status/1313938233445814274?t=gxuqLAtBQMvVdfgTN92F5g&s=19)
I think its gotta be Nick, but only by 1-3 pts overall.
Gotta figure Nicks got the advantage on passing, physicality, defense and durability. Caufiled might win on shooting but Suzuki is still damn good at that.
Haven’t played any NHL games in a while so my rating will probably be off, but I can see a world where they both have an 88 rating
Suzuki 89 / Caufield 87
Caufield will lack in too many stats, physical is 1/3 of the stats.
What did Miller say at the end?
I love these videos
Suzuki should be 88 or 89, and caufield, being honest he’s great but he can be as low as 87 and as high as 91, hot take but he’s got great potential, if he had a full season with 46 goals, which could’ve likely been 50 goals he’d be a 89+
Gonna be Suzuki by a close margin, followed by Caufield and Matheson.
Something like 89-88-86