@Wild du Minnesota

Aucun objectif n’est sûr. J’adore ne pas pouvoir célébrer les buts avant que la rondelle ne soit lâchée.


Aucun objectif n’est sûr. J’adore ne pas pouvoir célébrer les buts avant que la rondelle ne soit lâchée.


Fritztrocity1

4 Comments

  1. Paladad

    Offsides challenges are just such a waste of a hockey game. If it wasnt clear enough to be called offsides in the moment/immediately after review, it guaranteed didnt have enough impact on the play to matter

  2. KaprizFox

    I guarantee if it were the other way around (Columbus being challenged for offsides) the league would’ve called it a goal. 100%.

  3. HerbalAndy

    I swear this team has the most “close” calls that go against us that I’ve ever witnessed watching hockey…

    Specifically for this one, I didn’t see a single angle that showed offsides.. and even if it technically was.. it was so fucking close that it really shouldn’t have mattered. The refs didn’t call it when it was happening and was questionable at best when reviewing.. let’s move on.

    I’m sour about this because it feels like a hex on the Wild with shit like this.. Dean is so scared to challenge shit like this because even though it’s 50/50, it always seems to go against us no fucking matter what..

  4. _BeerAndCheese_

    Offside*

    Just to be pedantic and add to the annoyance.

    But I mean honestly. Reason it was added was because Duchene was awarded a goal in the playoffs against us when he was 5 miles offside, and everyone here was screaming for it to be reviewable. Can’t have it both ways. It’s annoying, but I’d rather have it be reviewable than have that shit happen again. And it seemed to happen a lot against us.

Write A Comment

Pin