[Sas] On dirait que les Canucks cherchent maintenant à déplacer Anthony Beauvillier au lieu de Conor Garland. Tocchet aime le jeu de Garland. Alors que Blueger est sur le point de revenir et que Höglander joue solidement, il y a une impasse devant.
—
-GregTheGreat-
26 Comments
That makes more sense.
That’s fine, but isn’t it Garland that wanted to be moved? Maybe the winning is changing things – it usually does.
This is what I’ve been saying all season, gotta move beau instead of garland. Beau kind of floats as where garland forechecks like crazy.
Dhaliwal is the engine that churns this media market. Surprised he wasn’t credited for this headline.
~~ »sounds like »~~ « Per Dhaliwal »
This feels like “sounds like” is doing a lot of work here.
Garland’s a good piece to move up if/when injuries hit, I think he and Miller had some chemistry earlier on
I’ve pitched the idea elsewhere to reasonable reviews but Beauvillier retained to 2.75 for Peeke with whatever very minor filler on either end makes sense to me
« Now »
As if that wasn’t a preferred option from day one. If you weren’t getting bites on Garland, you sure as shit ain’t gonna get nibbles on Beauvillier.
Edit – everyone responding to me about how his contract has one year left or if the canucks eat half he’d be good.
This is a guy who cannot play on our fourth line and you think another contending team is going to get to the deadline and say « yes, this is the one! » Any deal.with Beauvillier will need a sweetener and the Canucks won’t do that.
This makes way more sense to me. I don’t dislike Beauvillier but it just makes way more sense if both require retention, it’s far more reasonable to retain for the one year.
This makes more sense and doesn’t surprise me. Rutherford has a history of trading away players he’s recently acquired. See David Perron, Tanner Pearson, Erik Gudbranson in Pittsburgh. More recently, Lazar last year in Vancouver
Good luck moving either one of them. Market for middle six wingers isn’t exactly white hot.
Beauvillier is a good insurance policy if one of our top 6 goes down. He has proven with top minutes to be more than serviceable. I don’t think anyone is going to offer anything of value that surpasses this.
Although I want an upgrade on D and rebalancing of the skillsets in our forwards, somehow I no longer want to lose these players haha. They’re all playing together and doing really well. It’s a luxury to have a possible-top-6 down on the bottom lines, though he doesn’t offer much in forechecking. I also feel PDG is due to regress before the season ends and we might be wanting on the wings again down the line.
But does Garland want to be here? Is he okay playing most minutes on the 3rd line with limited to no PP time? Last we want is another disgruntled employee.
Ha! This is becoming a pattern. We spend months trying to trade a guy – we can’t do it, because no one wants our trash unless we sweeten the pot tremendously – then it’s ‘fine, if you think you’re so good and that all these teams want you, go ahead and try to trade yourself Mr. Valuable Asset you!’ – then, once the player is unable to get even a nibble, the player is all ‘I love this city now!’ and the team is all ‘the coach loves this guy, we aren’t trading him, now we’re trading [insert new underperforming player with negative value here]!’
So. How much does it cost to move 1×4.15m?
Maybe we can trade him to Montreal and get xhekaj in return
Beauviller is easier to move due to being UFA at end of season while Garland has 3 more years left with a bigger cap hit.
Let’s be real though, the team wants to move Garland because he doesn’t fit in the team anymore. He’s not getting top6 minutes and he doesn’t play on the pk. He also doesn’t score enough to justify giving him minutes as he hasn’t scored since hte opening game.
Cap space wise. This is gonna be interesting. It’s like the OEL trade where we end up trading an expiring term for a potentially long term one. If we want to resign Petey and Hronek, we should ideally be keeping the Myers contract and Beauvillier contract
Does anyone know how raty is doing?
Garland looks like he’s bought in 100%. Haven’t liked him before this season… thought he was too soft but looks like he’s bought into the identity they’re trying to create. He even made like a diving play to block a shot last game, which I don’t think I’ve ever seen half that defensive effort from him.
Beau just don’t look like this style fits his game at all
Honestly, both moving is best but obvs Beau with one year left is going to be way easier to move
I have like Beaulivier’s effort actually. I notice him doing the right thing a lot.
Keep both right now since we’d probably have to throw in sweeteners just to move them. The silver lining with these two streaky scorers not scoring right now is that they’ll eventually go on a 10 goal hot streak sometime in the middle of the season which will help solidify our playoff chances and increase the odds of finding a deal at the deadline.
Wish we had him play a bit of top line time instead of PDG to boost his value. He’s worth next to nothing right now.
That penalty that Garland drew on Desharnais is exactly why I love the guy. His smaller size and quick turns make players lose control of their stick, leading to tripping/hooking calls. Garland is the equivalent of the Greek God of Walks from Moneyball.