Le but potentiel des Rangers de New York a été refusé après un coup de sifflet lent et un long examen lors du match de dimanche contre les Blue Jackets de Columbus. https://scoutingtherefs.com/2023/11/42105/rangers-goal-disallowed-after-lengthy-review-vs-blue-jackets/ @scoutingtherefs
Related Posts
31 Comments
I’m a lifelong Rangers fan and I wanted that to be a goal. But from watching the videos I can’t say the puck was across the line before another Ranger smacked at it and hit the goalie’s pad. I think it was probably in but I don’t definitively see that.
Toronto officials again try to stick it to the rangers but the rangers get the last LAFF.
Vally nailed it when he said Elvis cheated there. This game never should have gone to overtime. if Kakko doesn't come over and bat at the pads, the refs don't have the ammo they needed to say it was a dead play
Imagine an entire officiating crew along with a state-of-the-art, multi-camera view manned by an “expert” crew, and they STILL can’t see it was an obvious goal!
Cbj has been screwed by the replay quite a bit this season so they were due. But on this? No question its a goal
It would be nice if you added your own assessment of the play/call.
Gee, if only there was a way to track the exact location of a puck. 😉
Don’t care for either team……but that was a goal!
Whistle went waaaaaaaay after the puck was in lol tf these guys talkin about. I mean honestly I feel like that goal probably shouldn’t count but the reason they gave was straight up just a fkn lie lmao
C’mon Ranger commentators…it’s the oldest trick in the book to throw yours hands up in the air and say “it’s in!”.
Trying to be as unbiased as possible. I’ve analyzed every angle at .25 speed. There are two definitive angles that show the puck gets wedged underneath Merzlekins glove and pad. And for a brief few frames you can see the puck fall down near his skate. Which is what Culye sees as he skates by is the puck on his skate behind the line.
To me, that entire part of his equipment in far enough in the net to be a good goal. I think merzlikins does a very good job hiding the puck. As after those few frames you can see the puck start to fall he moves his blocker over to try and pinch it.
The issue is, I don’t think there’s enough evidence to support that the puck had fully crossed the line from these angles since we can’t really see it.
HOWEVER. The referee never made a call initially, he didn’t have sight of the puck and instead of blowing the play dead, allowed play to continue until he skated over. He sees the puck in the net and then blows the play down.
That’s a huge issue to me. Had he blown the whistle immediately after Culye thought the puck went in. Then everything else that happened afterwards including the puck in the net should be wiped.
Instead he made no call, and didn’t blow the whistle until he had view of the puck in the net. Hard to argue it was frozen or there was an intent to blow when
1. The referee is supposed to determine when the puck is frozen by blowing the play dead especially if he loses sight of the puck.
And 2. He had no intention to blow the play down until he saw the puck in the net.
Could’ve avoided a lot of controversy had he immediately blown the play dead.
Got to watch that live in MSG and even I saw it, got to see the refs watch the play from just the front angle where you can’t see the puck, inside the net or the goalies equipment. Felt like the fix was in
Ok the reason why this wasn't called a goal was because the puck was initally sitting on top of the goalies skate but not fully across the line. When the rangers player comes in and jabs the pad the puck then falls into the net. The NHL determined the play was dead before that point which is why it was called off.
Boy the refs really hosed the Rangers last night but they overcame it great job
We're talking about a split second when the intent to blow the whistle occurs. The whistle blew 4 seconds after Cuylie pointed it in the net. That's an awful long time for a ref to say I intended to blow the play dead.
Was at the game. Was soo pissed. But rangers got the W they deserved
ehm ehm,bullshit!!!
The refs are so biased towards the Rangers, it's ridiculous
Even with video evidence the refs still lie .There's too many betting apps.
At the end of the day…Rangers Win!!!!
I love that the reviews always go to Toronto headquarters f##king joke.Tell me how many calls the rangers have gotten when they review our games hardy any.FIXXXXXXXXX
It was a goal clearly because the referees were supporting Patrik Lainey
Puck was frozen? Hahahahahahahahahaha.
NYR was on a mission after this call. 11-2-1.
Wanna scout the refs against NYR, this happened 2/3 weeks ago….. NYR@EDM, 3rd period (6:30 remaining) Rangers, Will Cuylle appeared to have a puck deflect off his skate into net. Ruled good on ice, Toronto’s situation room called it off with “kicking motion” 😳. Chi@Arz, 2nd period (4:45 remaining) Arizona, O’Brien appears to have a kicking motion, ruled no goal on ice, but Toronto’s situation room calls it a good goal 🤔. Pls review and tell me whats a “kicking motion”…. I’m clueless, I guess 🤯 Thanks ✌️
Refs were terrible in this game no doubt
Wonder why they didn’t show the goal cam?…
To my eye the puck went between the goalie’s glove and left pad. It sure looked like a goal to me.
This intent to blow the whistle is lame. Either the whistle was blown or not. Players are coached to play until they hear a whistle.
Hate the Rangers. This was a goal.
Hold the refs accountable… Or Toronto for that matter 😊
Idiotic call
Anyone here after the devils call?