Ouais. Évidemment, la défense est fragile, mais nous avons sans aucun doute un problème de gardien de but.

6 Comments

1. Junior-Box-6730 11 mois ago

   This shouts at me. Couching issue. It means an intensity issue. A game plan issue. A caring issue. Our team is talented enough. Our leaders aren’t doing enough. And that starts with coaching. Fire Lindy. Thank you for the development last year. You aren’t a winning coach.

2. sethlyons777 11 mois ago

   Yeah, 3 pretty rudimentary saves there for Schmid. Having said that, our pick handling and passing sucked most of the game and defense was pretty porous at the best of times. Got screwed on that goal in the second, so it could’ve easily been a 4-2 W. Just an ass game all around, no specific factor is to blame.

3. -PoeticJustice- 11 mois ago

   Is this good? Moral victories are not worth any points, but can we at least say we the team didn;t sleepwalk through? I didn’t watch the game tonight

4. DogInvestor 11 mois ago

   What goals should Schmid have saved in this game….cross ice passes..partial breakaway goal, tip in, etc….maybe the 5th goal when he hit the puck with his stick so the OPEN Shark could tap it in. I will maybe put that one goal on him, but then again, why was the Shark left open in front of the net? No Devil picked him up. Every one of these goals was on the defense.

5. Zestyclose_Estate248 11 mois ago

   I think accountability has been an issue.
   Im not sure what the solution is.

6. Dustmopper 11 mois ago

   I just watched the highlights of this game and the chances they showed were 16-6

   The sharks scored on all 6 of the plays they put in the highlight package