[Luszczyszyn] Depuis 2010, Connor Bedard joue avec le deuxième pire casting de soutien de tous les premiers choix au classement général. Et les adversaires les plus coriaces. Décomposition de son utilisation extrême précoce :
—
jjb8712
@Blackhawks de Chicago
7 Comments
Link to X post: [here](https://x.com/domluszczyszyn/status/1732779505628930067?s=46)
Link to Athletic article: [here](https://theathletic.com/5117388/2023/12/07/connor-bedard-blackhawks-numbers/)
Bedard is the one thing on this team I’m not worried about at all
But according to Doms model for the Calder, Bedard is not even top 5. Wtf is this guy doing anymore?
I’m glad he made this follow-up article. I was a little annoyed the other day when he had Bedard ranked 9th in the Calder race, without really looking into why his numbers said that. A lot of these advanced stats guys will just say, « Well the model says it’s true, therefore it is », so props to him for admitting that the model isn’t perfect in extreme cases like Bedard (who is clearly the top rookie this year).
The kid’s first shift was L1 v L1 against a future hall of famer. And it hasn’t gotten much easier since then, if at all(except not everyone is Sid). I haven’t been following the other rooks that much, I wonder where Karlsson and Fantilli would be on this chart.
I just don’t want him getting frustrated. I know we’re not gonna be bad forever but you can see that each loss aggravates him and I don’t want him to feel like our organization isn’t a good long term fit for him, especially after the Perry fiasco.
I liked the team KD assembled. But man, maybe we should have brought in just a little more talent looking at it with hindsight.