La règle dit que si le juge de lignes doit faire une décision de bâton élevé parce que l’arbitre l’a manqué, la décision est automatiquement une double mineure, peu importe l’absence de blessure ou de sang en conséquence.
@kylekeefetv @RycroftMark @katie_gaus @mitchabov @RadioMoser I may have found the answer to the double minors. I believe both plays were doubles because linesmen called them. Rule says if linesman assesses penalty for missed high-stick, then it *has to be* double, or no penalty. pic.twitter.com/pakl3cYpQh
— Leah Angstman: Buy SHOOT THE HORSES FIRST! (@leahangstman) January 7, 2024
—
NotHorrendous
2 Comments
i got downvoted for saying this in the gdt but this is literally what happened. the refs had no idea wtf happened so they called a double minor so they could review it. it was very clearly a high stick so therefore the call stands..
i like to see them get the call right but as far as i could see there was no blood so them having to call a double minor just so they could review it is just plain bs.
What a dumb fuckin rule. It makes sense why they’d have a quick review when the refs missed it in real time but I can’t conceive of a reason why it can’t then be assessed as an appropriate 2 minute minor after review.