Regardez l’attaquant des Flames de Calgary Andrew Mangiapane se faire créditer d’un but après qu’il a été déterminé lors d’un examen que la rondelle était entrée sur le bâton d’un joueur des Maple Leafs de Toronto. ————————————————— Abonnez-vous à Sportsnet sur YouTube – http://sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L Visitez Sportsnet.ca pour plus de nouvelles et de faits saillants sur les sports – http://www.sportsnet.ca Suivez Sportsnet sur Facebook – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTFB Suivez Sportsnet sur Twitter – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR Suivez Sportsnet sur Instagram – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTINST Suivez Sportsnet sur Snapchat – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP Suivez Sportsnet sur TikTok – http://sprtsnt.ca/ YTTIKTOK Regardez Sportsnet sur Sportsnet maintenant – http://sportsnet.ca/now ———————————- ———— Sportsnet est le réseau sportif numéro 1 au Canada. Votre maison pour les derniers moments forts, les dernières nouvelles sportives, des interviews approfondies d’athlètes, des podcasts de pointe, des diffusions en direct et bien plus encore. Ne manquez pas un seul but marquant, un énorme home run, un dunk exceptionnel ou un touché époustouflant. Obtenez des informations exclusives et des informations de pointe sur le secteur avec un accès inégalé. Apprenez à connaître une autre facette de vos superstars sportives préférées dans des interviews comiques uniques et décalées. Sportsnet est le guichet unique pour le fan qui sommeille en chacun de nous. —————————————————
@Flames de Calgary
17 Comments
If your house caught fire, what would you save first? 🍒
BWAHAHAHA if tranna can’t seriously beat Cowtown and we dismantle and beat the living crap out of Cowtown then every player on the Queefs should demand a trade and rebuild. Imagine this living joke of a cup contender losing to the fLames? McJesus and the oilers could NEVER
Edit: Never mind I was wrong, I didn't see the rule 49.2 (ii) that says a deflection off a stick is a good goal, I was only looking at rule 37.4 which doesn't clarify that point.
This should not have been a goal, according to the rules a deflection off a player after a kick is NOT a goal and that's what the ref's announced – it deflected off Lilygren's stick so it was a "good goal"… a deflection is not possession and only possession could negate the kick unless they decided his distinct kicking motion wasn't a kick so these refs made up their own rules or announced the wrong reason, either way they were wrong.
FIRE KEEFE FIRE KEEFE TIMES UP TIMES UP TIMES UP TIMES UP FIRE KEEFE NOW SHANAHAN GOTTA TO GO TOO FIRE THEM NOW!!!! BESIDES THE COACH LOSES US GAMES, GOALTENDING ATROCIOUS!!! FIRE THEM NOW!!!
😂☠️☠️☠️ enjoy it leafs fans, 5 blown leads in a row.
Not a deflection from the leaf. He pushed it in
I don't understand why can't you kick the puck in? If the NHL wants more offense and increase scoring than scoring goals either by stick, by hand or by foot should count. Also get rid of the offside rule as well.
100% kicking goal….
The Toronto defenseman touched it after the kick. It was then pushed in while on the line by the flames players. This is absolutely a good goal, no discression whatsoever.
Congrats leafs I mean refs you finally won a game
Hockey is getting worse
He kicked it with his left skate and the puck defected off his right skate, that wasn’t a kicking motion, good goal as it was deflected in.
why dont the refs just wear blue jerseys, what a joke this is
The Leaf’s defence are doing their thing.
it took the refs handing them a win to snap out of theb losing streak. Leafs still suck lol
that's not a kick first of all, just a double deflection off both skates. even if it had been kicked, toronto touches it before it crosses the line. good goal either way
Well, they got this one right.