The only roster player they should accept going back is Suter.
If Bo Horvat, the team captain, on an incredible season pulled 1st, Raty, and Bauvillier, thereâs no reason Lindholm should be more. That would be something like belike 1st, Raty, Suter for Van.
Same with Zadorov bringing in a 3rd and a 5th, Tanev should be similar. Heâs 34 and injury prone.
A fair trade back would be Suter, Raty, 1st, 3rd, and 5th, for both. Van would need to add in order for them to retain 50 percent on both deals, but thatâs actually around what a fair deal would be.
10 Comments
No to the trade they will break up yhe chemistry they have now
The only roster player they should accept going back is Suter.
If Bo Horvat, the team captain, on an incredible season pulled 1st, Raty, and Bauvillier, thereâs no reason Lindholm should be more. That would be something like belike 1st, Raty, Suter for Van.
Same with Zadorov bringing in a 3rd and a 5th, Tanev should be similar. Heâs 34 and injury prone.
A fair trade back would be Suter, Raty, 1st, 3rd, and 5th, for both. Van would need to add in order for them to retain 50 percent on both deals, but thatâs actually around what a fair deal would be.
I donât want them to trade Höglander
Nope
Leave well enough alone
they aint trading hoglander
Hoglander is on a contract comparable to an ELC, player value doesnât get much higher than that, considering how heâs performed.
Hell no Hoglander must stay.
What a bunch if crap, they are not trading Hoglander. Flames wish
Let's add to our scoring, not take away from it