Per Brooks : « Elias Lindholm est en tête de la liste de souhaits des Blueshirts et il l’était même avant que Chytil ne soit exclu pour l’année. »
—
ShouniAishaKuma
@Rangers de New York
Per Brooks : « Elias Lindholm est en tête de la liste de souhaits des Blueshirts et il l’était même avant que Chytil ne soit exclu pour l’année. »
—
ShouniAishaKuma
15 Comments
I want Lindholm and Hanifin.
Massive underperformer, expensive contract and only a rental. Pass.
Another guy who only scores on the power play right? Just what we need.
Don’t forget the part of the article Larry says he thinks its a bad move and this isn’t the year to dump assets for a run.
No way they trade Othmann or Cuyle for a rental.
NYR desperately needs offense at 5v5, so they’re going to trade for a guy who is extremely mediocre at 5v5 offense and has fewer 5v5 goals this season than Julien Gauthier in like quadruple the playing time?
NYR never ceases to amaze me. It’s clear that not only do they have no idea what their own problems are as a team, but they don’t even know the strengths and weaknesses of the players they’re targeting. They just see the name and what the player did years ago
Lindholm is a pretty good player, he’s pretty clearly primed for a bounce back. He’s sitting on a year to date shooting percentage that is clearly mostly bad luck. He’s not a true 40 goal scorer, but he’s clearly a 20-25 goal scoring center that is good defensively. The problem isn’t Lindholm himself, but that he’s not a natural fit for the Rangers. Are they going to move him (or Mika) to RW to try to kick start the top line? That seems risky, but it also doesn’t seem like an obviously good idea to give up major assets for him and then make him a 3C, second PP unit guy so that he barely has a chance to contribute.
Not worth it. For a 3C find a player that won’t command an obscene return.
Please let this be true
This is exactly the type of guy who comes to NYR and underperforms. Pass.
Why…
Can we stop burning assets that put us as perennial middle of the draft team. Its not sustainable success to keep trading picks and other stuff for rentals
I think K’andre and Kakko could be part of a trade for Lindholm and Hanafin. Question is who would Drury rather part with, Kakko or a top tier prospect like Othmann. Have to assume Perreault is off limits. Calgary has recently come out and said they want NHL’ers, guys who can come in and play now and that’s Kakko and I think he’d be on Calgary’s list for a return, same with Key.
Atleast we have a chance to keep our 1st giving up two NHL players with high upsides, and when/if we waive guys like Pitlick and Brodz that’ll free up cap space for a winger.
The way I see it right now is that if Drury wants Lindholm, he’s gonna get Lindholm. It doesn’t seem like he’s gonna not overpay. Now is that the wrong decision? Yeah probably but Dolan wants this team to win and perform so here we are. NYR Don’t do small deadlines
We need 5v5 goals.
Drury: lets shop kakko and try to get lindholm.
Lindholm has as many 5v5 goals as kakko while carrying double the cap space……
Idk why we are bothering to chase a rental who cant score at 5v5
Big yikes. I don’t know how people are defending drury up to this point already. If this moves happens and we have another early exit, he needs to be fired to the fucking moon