L’initié de la LNH, Frank Seravalli, récapitule comment l’échange d’Elias Lindholm s’est déroulé. Frank discute de l’angle Kuzmenko, de la signature de Lindholm par les Canucks, des améliorations potentielles en défense, du travail de Patrik Allvin en tant que directeur général cette saison et de certaines des histoires de la LNH. Présenté par Four Winds Brewing (https://fourwindsbrewing.ca/) 💻 Site Web : https://canucksarmy.com 🐦 Suivez sur Twitter : https://twitter.com/CanucksArmy 📲 Suivez sur Instagram : https://www. instagram.com/canucksarmydotcom/ 👍 J’aime sur Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/CanucksArmy/ 📺 Abonnez-vous sur YouTube : @Canucks_Army #VancouverCanucks #NHL #Hockey #Vancouver
@Canucks de Vancouver
16 Comments
To be fair….Harm is always staring into the abyss lol. Harm seems to always stare blankly at Quads when Quads is talking and idk why but everytime I see that it just looks funny to me lol.
love the columbus talk
Is Seravalli literally on all non-mass media stations?
Frank was on fire today lol
Lekkerimaki for David Jiricek?
Frank is out to lunch. Canucks are best overall but not the best top 6. The third line is dominate. Stop with the names and look at the success. Then Hoglander and Lafferty are 4th liners on pace for 20 goals each
Kekäläinen has a picture of someone humping a goat. Only way he hasn't been fired.
Don’t forget, Canucks have now set the price. Teams might not pull the trigger now, therefore win for Canucks
What’s the issue with Juulsen? The guy is an old school D man that plays HARD and a consistent. When Soucy returns having Juulsen as ur Andrew Alberts coming off bench is what most teams would crave. Too much insight into nothing the team is Set for most part sorry
The last time the nucks went to the finals, our lack of defensive depth cost us
Surely someone in the CBC watches this. Frank deserves greater exposure and the Hists will eventually be more recognized.
Best in the biz.
Lol comparing nucks and oilers bottom six when the oilers literally have Connor, 4 points zero goals, Brown on their team is laughable. Nucks bottom six> Oilers bottom six. No question.
You guys need more material for when frank comes on the last 10 minutes was pointless
Frank Wondering how the canucks bottom 6 stack up when our 3rd line has been one of the best statistically in all of hockey this year and we have hoglander on our 4th on pace for 20 + gino’s…
interesting perspective. my money’s still on the canucks.
01:50 – If you look at how many goals the "bottom seven" (based on ice time) of the best teams in the league (and a couple of teams that are known for having a deep forward lineup) has scored up to the Allstar break, Canucks ranks third.
1. Seattle: 59 goals, 263 games, 0,224 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 50 games for the team = 1,180 goals/game from bottom seven
2. Detroit: 59 goals, 286 games, 0,206 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 50 games for the team= 1,180 goals/game from bottom seven
3. Canucks: 57 goals, 290 games, 0,197 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 49 games for the team= 1,163 goals/game from bottom seven
4. Carolina: 52 goals, 302 games, 0,171 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 48 games for the team= 1,083 goals/game from bottom seven
5. Winnipeg:49 goals, 268 games, 0,183 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 47 games for the team= 1,043 goals/game from bottom seven
6. Dallas: 49 goals, 296 games, 0,166 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 49 games for the team= 1,000 goals/game from bottom seven
7. LA: 46 goals, 281 games, 0,164 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 48 games for the team= 0,958 goals/game from bottom seven
8. Boston:44 goals,257 games, 0,171 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 49 games for the team= 0,898 goals/game from bottom seven
9. Colorado: 39 goals, 291 games, 0,134 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 49 games for the team= 0,796 goals/game from bottom seven
10. Vegas: 39 goals, 258 games, 0,151 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 50 games for the team= 0,780 goals/game from bottom seven
11. Rangers: 35 goals, 295 games, 0,118 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 49 games for the team= 0,714 goals/game from bottom seven
12. Toronto: 32 goals, 257 games, 0,124 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 47 games for the team= 0,680 goals/game from bottom seven
13. Oilers: 24 goals, 234 games, 0,098 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 46 games for the team= 0,522 goals/game from bottom seven
14. Florida: 25 goals, 264 games, 0,094 goals/game per bottom seven player, in 49 games for the team = 0,510 goals/game from bottom seven
Explanation: Canucks bottom seven players (based on ice time, I went with seven to somewhat adjust for injuries and scratches) has (together) scored 57 goals, played 290 games for an average of 0,197 goals per game per bottom seven player. In 49 games this bottom seven group has scored an average of 1,163 goals per game.
This stats is not perfect, since it does not take into account if a team has had many injuries in the bottom six and played lots of different players there. But it paints a picture that says that Canucks actually has one of the deeper forward lineups in the league, at least as far as scoring goes.