@Avalanche du Colorado

Frank Seravalli pense qu’on va lâcher deux 1ers et un 3ème sur Guentzel + Nedeljkovic


Frank Seravalli pense qu’on va lâcher deux 1ers et un 3ème sur Guentzel + Nedeljkovic


Andrew_Coglianus

25 Comments

  1. thriller1

    That feels way too expensive for something that’s not a solution to the 2C problem

  2. Seravalli is full of shit like 95% of the time so I would not believe this unless it actually happens.

  3. TheCodr

    Worst part is they can’t spell “acquire”

  4. D-Broncos

    I don’t think it’s worth trying to find a 2C. After seeing the cost of Manahon and Lindholm. If Landy and Val come back we don’t need one in theory. The top 6 would be Mack, Rant, Drouin, Val, Lieky, and Landy. Why give up so much?

  5. InsectTop618

    The only penguin our two firsts are going to is Crosby

  6. Vivid_Walk_1405

    2 actual 1st round picks not recent first round prospects is crazy for any rental. I think a 2nd line with Val and Guentzel could really alleviate the pressure on a 2c but this is crazy

  7. Zambonist2

    That’s a weird way to spell “Sidney Crosby”

  8. TossThatPastaSalad

    Seems like I’m the only one in the thread but I like this.  Guentzel is a nice fit.

  9. CitizenNaab

    I’d love the 2 from PIT but I would hate giving all that up for them

  10. Environmental-Ball24

    ![gif](giphy|Kfkmx691No1pNdc2nQ|downsized)

  11. Vandy1358v2_0

    ![gif](giphy|xiMUwBRn5RDLhzwO80|downsized)

  12. MocDcStufffins

    Not for a pure rental. If they had a pre negotiated extension that was a reasonable AAV, that would make it more palatable. But I still don’t see 2 firsts.

  13. XxNHLxX

    Isn’t Guentzel about to get a massive raise on his next deal? In what way would this be worth it to the Avs beyond getting another top 6 rental winger? Hard pass.

  14. Kyveido

    I had no idea Guentzel played centre. Hmm!

    Ned as a back up I ain’t against though.

  15. schewbacca

    for 2 first and a 3rd we better be getting a player with term (at least signed another year or rfa). Guentzel a good player but pass.

  16. mattvn66

    That won’t be enough, our firsts are basically 2nds and the market for Guentzel is very competitive. Also doesn’t make sense to get another winger

  17. Buzzsaw_Dynamo

    I wonder if they try and make Mikko 2C, then I could understand this move.

  18. AuntGentleman

    This is basically a 1st for Guentzel, a 1st for retention, and a 3rd for a backup goalie.

    Which uhh, no. I’d do a 1st and a 2nd but not 2 1sts this is bonkers.

  19. pforsbergfan9

    You guys know there’s a difference been giving insider info and just giving an opinion on what a good trade for two teams looks like?

  20. mitch-dubz

    Isn’t this guy one of the most miserable sacks of crap in the biz? Gives me Dater vibes.

  21. theonlyzeats93

    I’d rather have Crosby for that price

Write A Comment

Pin