@Canucks de Vancouver

J’aime qu’ils aient laissé Kuzmenko au conseil d’administration


J’aime qu’ils aient laissé Kuzmenko au conseil d’administration


luisquin

10 Comments

  1. DMyourboooobs

    Which one do you think is kuzmenko?

  2. ubcthrowaway-01

    I see the Kuzmenko after u pointed it out but who’s the Horvat lookin guy to Garland’s left

  3. natedogjulian

    Sick of hearing about that guy. He gone.

  4. PaperweightCoaster

    I would be okay if he was in the picture. He played for us this season and contributed to the success of the team, nothing wrong with acknowledging that. Not like it’s a state secret.

  5. Maverick533

    Who’s on the right, smoking a cigarette? Lol

  6. JauntyGiraffe

    lol it would be fine if they really did leave him on it. He had a bad stretch of the season with us but he was a good teammate til the end. No one has hard feelings towards Kuzy around these parts

    He played 41 games for us this season. Theoretically he could be included on the Cup

  7. PetterssonCDR

    Guys it’s zadorovs mouth guard not a cigarette lmao

  8. TimTebowMLB

    Season stats for Kuzmenko and Lindholm:

    Kuzmenko:

    72 Games Played +/- : -9

    22G/24A/46P for 0.65 Points per game

    Lindholm:

    75 Games Played +/- : -14

    15G/29A/44P for 0.57 Points per game

    I know there’s more than just points and plus/minus is a flawed stat but we gave up a lot for Lindholm. I really hope it ends up working out for us. Also I felt like our center depth was already quite good with 5 NHL level centres. A scoring winger for Petey’s line a la Guentzel seemed to be the best move.

    Even if you remove Kuzmenko from the trade it would be nice to have another 1st and Hunter Brzustewicz in the system

Write A Comment

Pin