@Maple Leafs de Toronto

Qui est à blâmer pour cette situation marner à Toronto? | SDP



Steve Dangle, Adam Wylde et Jesse Blake discutent de la façon dont les Maple Leafs de Toronto ont géré la situation de Mitch Marner et partagent leurs réflexions sur qui, selon eux, est responsable de la façon dont tout cela s’est déroulé. Pour les demandes de renseignements générales, envoyez un courriel : info@sdpn.ca Contactez https://www.sdpn.ca/sales pour entrer en contact avec notre équipe de vente et discuter de l’opportunité d’intégrer votre marque dans notre contenu !

22 Comments

  1. Steve is being emotional. There might be better options next off season John comes off the books. We can reaches where everyone is.

  2. If the Leafs traded Marner and they do not hit a home run from the trade. Marner's new team wins the trade and possibly wins the Stanley Cup. No member of the Leafs head office will remain. Brad will most likely never be trusted as a general manager in the NHL. He has traded away an all-star players in the prime of their careers. In both cases, your team lost both trades, and the all star player won the Stanley Cup while both the Stanley Cup while in their prime.

  3. FYI… both traded players played on the same line, winning the Memorial Cup. Marner also won the series MVP.

  4. Steve….you are wrong.

    Unless you get back a Pasta, or Kooch you cant trade a marquee rw just because you havent won the cup yet. Yzerman didnt win until YEAR 12. Should he have been traded? Ovechkin was like year 13, should the Caps have traded him?

    You sign him and byild a better team. 5.5m gets you a pretty good defender. Consistent goaltending would help.

    Not Marners fault

  5. Steve is right, no move clause stink, too many what ifs, and look what happens. And they are doing it again. There is slow learners and no leaners, the Leafs management appear to be the no learners

  6. This management need to grow a BACKBONE! Their negotiating is horrendous.

  7. If Marner plans to use next year to prove his value and not re-sign then bench him and let his value turn to nothing.
    Call his bluff!

  8. Dumbass is to blame for giving that marshmallow 10 million a year before he proved that he could deliver "when it counts"

  9. Steve, you are right that they had a chance to move Marner before the no move clause kicked in. The problem with your argument is, had the team traded Mitch would Mathews and Nylander have signed extensions? Maybe not. They could not even extend until after July 1st. If Marner was smart he would resign for 8 years for less to stay with his buddies. Lets say 9.9 mil. All the pressure would come off him and turn around the negative sentiment that he wants to stay and win the Cup. If he wants to leave this market because he wants more money than it still makes more sense to do an eight year sign and trade instead of a 7 year UFA deal. Maybe we get something back on defence or picks/prospects and cap space. He leaves on good terms. You guy are talking about Marners team not wanting to even talk about extending but what if Tavares does. He might be the key. If JT really wants to win a cup in Toronto as he says would he extend for say 3 mil for 3 years? That would also change the sentiment on the whole group of 4. Now if both resign you go with the young guys, Minten, Cowan etc. instead of Domi and Bertuzzi. See what you have in the system first. Woll and a cheap veteran backup with Hidebeast moving up and down from the minors as a 3 goalie unit. Even could be Samsonov if he would stay as backup for 2.5 mil. You bank the cap savings for the deadline and pick up a guy like Vegas did (Hanifin) at the deadline you no you can actually resign because you know how much cap space you will have the following year.

  10. Signing Marner the way they did was appropriate at the time of signing. How is Dubas supposed to know that Marner becomes a liability in the playoffs and loses all effort/compete level years down the line

Write A Comment

Pin