@Rangers de New York

Mises à jour en pourcentage du 11 juin. La recherche de l’ailier droit de Kreider + Zibanejad pour 2024-2025.


Mises à jour en pourcentage du 11 juin. La recherche de l’ailier droit de Kreider + Zibanejad pour 2024-2025.


SquashMarks

15 Comments

  1. SquashMarks

    From Gardenhockeysource.com:

    RW ODDS TO PLAY WITH KREIDER + ZIBANEJAD

    ——————————
    -Kane 40% (FA, allowed bonuses 35+ increases% if agrees to bonuses–mutual interest—Highest % = current prediction. If Kane signs bonuses 2 RWs from this list become possible. If 1 year bonus deal I’d lock it in at 90%-100%, if no bonus deal 25%).

    -Stamkos 25% (FA–the hope–therefore if he is a free agent on July 1st his % will increase a bunch).

    -Lindholm 25% (FA–only if 1 year. If multiple years 0%)

    -Marchessault 15% (FA)

    -Duchene 15% (FA)

    -Tarasenko 15% (FA– mutual interest)

    -Ehlers 15% (1 year on contract)

    -Tuch 15% (Drury has some interest in the player long term but pricey to acquire)

    -Zegras 15% (Drury has some interest in the player long term but pricey to acquire)

    -Guentzel 10% (only possible if Trouba’s full cap hit traded).

    -Domi 10% (FA–C+W, Drury likes)

    -Debrusk 10% (FA–NYR have expressed interest in him in the past).

    -Bertuzzi 5% (FA)

    -Arvidssen 5% (FA)

    -Kakko 5% (things have to rly rly not work out)

    -Toffoli 5% (FA–was available at deadline, Drury didn’t trade for him).

    -Gourde 5% (1 yr on contract, didn’t trade for him at trade deadline, was available).

    -Teravainen 5% (FA)

    -Duclair 5% (FA–available at deadline Drury didn’t try to trade for him).

    -Stephenson 5% (FA)

    -Vatrano 5% (1 year on contract, didn’t trade for him at trade deadline, was available).

    -Buchnevich 5% (1 year on contract, didn’t trade for him at trade deadline, was available).

    -Reinhart 5% (only possible if Trouba’s full cap hit traded)

    -Marner 5% (only possible if Trouba’s full cap hit traded)

    -Konecny 5% (NYR would have interest if Flyers make him available, but per source lists him as doubtful to be traded unless a big overpayment).

  2. SquashMarks

    CHANCE % OF LEAVING TEAM
    ———————————
    -Gustafsson 100%

    -Roslovic 100%

    -Kakko 95% (wants top 6 role + NYR need cap space)

    -Wennberg 85% (If Chytil gets moved (low%), source is saying Rangers could re-sign Wennberg if Chytil’s value is at the value of a 2C—DOUBTFUL with the concerns but just takes 1 general manager to want to take that chance).

    -Goodrow 85% (need cap space for RW1)

    -Wheeler 75% (either return to NYR on min deal or retire)

    -Lindgren 20% (Chychrun, Zadorov)

    -Trouba 15%

    -Chytil 15%

    -Jones 15% (per source says if NYR get a vet-big man LHD on a discount in FA that they like a lot, they could go that way and get assets for Jones. They won’t let Jones be 7th d-man).

    -Miller 5% (Chychrun, Zadorov, NYR prefer Miller over Lindgren makes it highly likely Miller will be back unless a crazy offer for him).

  3. PM_ME_YOUR_COMMAS

    Lindholm is 0%, he has reportedly declined 8-9 mill a year deals in Calgary

  4. MeatManBoykid

    I’d make a play for Tuch. Guys got a lot of playoff experience playing in Buffalo

  5. ArtemisBakery

    This guy posting Kane propaganda again lol. Everyone complaining about our core being soft, this would make them way softer

  6. gibson531

    Personally, I would be interested in Chytil. I know he’s a natural Center, but Idk if I want him getting 3rd line minutes.

  7. WorkoutMan885

    How about we split them up since nobody fucking works with them? And truthfully they suck with each other aside from the PK

  8. jkman61494

    To me the obvious one between who they are, past history, age and cost is Marchessault. He’s a sand paper type of player that you need for the playoffs and he’s spent basically his last 6 years going through the battles

    The concern honestly is he’s gone through so many he may be an old 33. But given the fact this group is basically gonna be the same until 2026, giving him a 3 year $6M type contract isn’t outlandish.

    I do believe we’d have to 100% trade Kakko though in the process and do our best to unload one of Trouba or Goodrow because that $11m AAV on Shesterkin is coming by 2025

  9. SquashMarks

    Dang sorry for posting what someone else reports. Just trying to get the conversation going

  10. SquashMarks

    I doubt he makes it but I will be following Gabe Perrault’s camp closely, he seems to have what it takes to be a top 6 winger in the NHL so I’d imagine we don’t make any kind of long term signing

  11. FoxMan1Dva3

    How about this. Those 2 should be obviously split up.

  12. _Noah93

    I wouldn’t even mind Kane. He put up a point per game, he seems much more healthy now, and he’d be likely the only one that wouldn’t hurt us long term with cap so we could have roster stability in the coming years.

Write A Comment

Pin