@Canadiens de Montréal

[TFP] « Les sénateurs sont prêts à échanger le 7e choix au classement général ».


Selon nous, que faudrait-il pour décrocher le 7e choix d’Ottawa?

Imaginons que les rumeurs soient vraies selon lesquelles le repêchage se prépare à inclure Celebrini, Levshunov, Silayev, Lindstrom, Demidov. Si nous pouvions échanger contre la 7e place d’Ottawa au classement général, j’aimerais que nous repêchions également Iginla. Je pense qu’il sera un véritable étalon de la ligue et un guerrier des séries éliminatoires.

Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky Iginla-Dach-Demidov Newhook-Beck-Roy

Cette programmation nourrirait les familles. Je ne sais même pas lequel des six premiers serait exclu de la première ligne PP. Bon équilibre entre taille et compétence.

Ottawa essaie d’ouvrir une fenêtre de séries éliminatoires, donc je ne pense pas que les choix au repêchage comptent beaucoup pour eux. Je pense qu’une partie de la demande serait similaire à celle d’Anaheim à Guhle ou Reinbacher. J’aime ces deux joueurs et je pense qu’ils sont d’énormes piliers de notre futur noyau défensif d’élite, mais étant donné l’excès de jeunes défenseurs, seriez-vous d’accord pour déplacer l’un d’entre eux pour renforcer notre groupe d’attaquants ? Je considérerais fortement Guhle + 26e au classement général pour monter et atterrir à Iginla. Je suis un grand fan de Matheson, mais j’envisagerais certainement de le déplacer si c’est ce que souhaite Ottawa à la place.

Les chances que nous évoluions au 7ème rang du classement général sont minces, voire nulles, mais je pense que ce serait un énorme mouvement de puissance et nous compléterions immédiatement notre groupe d’attaquants de base.


stuartkevinmurray

18 Comments

  1. Kotkaniemint

    They’d probably be looking for Reinbacher or Guhle if they were going to trade with us. They’re likely going to take a defenseman that’s a few years away from chipping in, so they’ll likely target a more NHL ready defense asset.

  2. CrashTestMummies

    Not going to happen but imagine having the 5th , 7th and 10th picks in this year’s draft

  3. /r/Habs dream top 6:

    Necas – Zegras – Laine

    5th OVR- 7th OVR – 10th OVR

  4. Riderpride639

    WPG 1st, Harris and/or Barron, Farrell or Mesar, Norlinder.

    Give them one NHL ready and one developing D prospect, and shoe in Farrell or Mesar with the late 1st to match value (so to speak).

  5. it was said at a STH meeting, and the people at the event did not get the impression they were going to trade it

    it’s just being misinterpreted by media members for some clicks

  6. Electrical_Analyst65

    They are going to want Reinbacher or Guhle. Not the time to trade either of those guys. If they are traded it needs to be a bonafide top line scorer. 

  7. If they want matheson plus 26th hell yes, doubt they say yes to that though. Guhle is a no-go, unless it’s maybe 1 for 1. We are (hopefully) nearing the end of the rebuild so I don’t know if Kent would want to sacrifice someone entering their mid 20s for a guy who won’t be big piece for probably 5 years. 

  8. Honestly, if it’s Guhle they want, I’m pulling the trigger.

    We could pick up a guy like Buium or Dickinson, which have a lot more upside, and still draft a high-end forward.

  9. FlowShredder

    these clowns traded a top 10 picks 2 years ago and regretted it

  10. Fleche_de_feu

    Hmmm guhle for 7th overall.

    Lets say you draft buium or dickinson with that pick and with the 5th you get demidov. That sounds pretty interesting on paper for the 7th overall but its tough to make the call you will play vs guhle for the next few seasons and if he pans out to be a 1st pair dman on the sens and produce 40-50 points per year while you drafted a bust that will be for sure a tough one to swallow

  11. Would’ve been able to get a landslide steal if Dorion was still around smh. Doubt we’re able to do it now without an overpay, but I’d love to have another pick in the top 10.

  12. Capable-Mobile-8260

    It would be too expensive. Better off hoping iginla or sennecke drop like crazy and we trade for like the 15 or 16th pick. Thats the only scenario I can see where that lineup becomes a reality without sacrificing an important part of the future.

  13. Bebop_Rocksteady27

    Would be much easier and cost less to trade the Wpg 1st + and snag Eiserman. Coming out of this draft with those 2 plus whatever else with remaining picks (plus current prospect pool) has me seriously and confidently thinking we are contending in 3 years

  14. There opened to do so cause there gonna have another 7th overall pick next year

Write A Comment

Pin