@Golden Knights de Vegas

Beaucoup de discussions commerciales avec Théodore. Je n’ai pas vu de mention de Hill


Comme la plupart d’entre vous, j’ai récemment déconné sur CapFriendly avant qu’il ne disparaisse. Quelque chose que je n’avais pas envisagé dans toutes mes variantes de roster est potentiellement le trading de Hill

D’un côté, il semble que Cassidy le favorise. D’un autre côté, il semble que Thompson puisse le remplacer. Nous pourrions trouver un gardien suppléant de 1,5 à 2 millions, comme Brossoit.

Si nous signons Doro à 1,5 et Korczac à 0,9 et échangeons Whitecloud pour faire de la place à Korczac, et que Brisson fait partie de la liste… nous avons 12 millions pour recruter un gardien de but suppléant et n’avons qu’une seule place à combler. C’est également avec Hutton sur la liste en tant que 7e joueur.

Cela pourrait même suffire à recruter Marchy, Stephenson, un gardien de but suppléant, puis Brisson se bat pour une place dans l’équipe. Ou il suffit de recruter un gardien de but suppléant et de tout mettre en œuvre pour un ailier. Ils pourraient même conserver un peu pour l’année prochaine afin d’avoir une casquette pour Thompson, Hague et Theo tout en obtenant un étalon droit.

C’est certainement une idée intéressante à laquelle je n’avais pas pensé jusqu’à aujourd’hui.

Qu’en pensez-vous tous ?


captnchunky

11 Comments

  1. AcceptableAgent31

    Thompson is mega ultra cheap, which is probably why they won’t move him.

    I think many of us forget how badly Thompson dropped the ball in November/December/January.

    Neither Hill nor Thompson are long term investments, that’s why Hill was signed for only 2 years and Thompson’s style does not complement our defensive structure when our defensive structure is good.

    I have never liked Thompson, so I do have a bias.

    I’ll also stand on this hill for a long long time. Theodore isn’t moving. He’s a crucial pin, and our defence, when he was injured, was significantly worse. You don’t trade Theo, and ever get something that can fill that gap. You also make another team, much much better. We have one of the strongest d corps in the league, you don’t sell one of those pieces because of a slight downturn in a year where everyone was bad. Save for the 32 year old who still isn’t worth the paycheque he’s going to ask for.

  2. DonkenG

    That looks like some Washington Capitals propaganda site

  3. particleman3

    I don’t know that we trade Hill. LT is streaky and when he is good he is great. BUT we have also had GK injury issues over the last few years so depth is crucial there right now.

  4. rollduptrips

    LT is not fundamentally solid enough IMO. He gets out of position consistently, and being in position is super important in this defense

  5. rowdywp

    I dont thibk there is any way we go into the season with Patera and one of Thompson/Hill.

  6. Taladanarian27

    Trading Hill is too risky IMO. It’s not like we have a defined #1 as much as we like to honk the horn for goalie depth. And who would want him after this last season. Yes he was good when healthy but he was out half the year. We wouldn’t get much from him. Better to wait another year to see if he can up his stock and either become a regular member of the team next year again or gain trade value. Right now we couldn’t get much from him and would likely lose more than we could gain. Just my measley two cents

  7. Wafflemonster2

    I’ve read murmurs/hypotheticals of a trade involving Tommy and Theo for Marner, which makes sense for both teams even if I hate it. Theo is definitely a top pairing Dman that’s gonna want top pairing money after this year, and with Hanifin, we can’t really offer him that. Tommy is definitely a starter who’s gonna want starter money…also after this year. I’d prefer to keep Tommy over Hill due to the slight difference in age alone, but it’s clear Hill is the guy.

    Theo’s my fav remaining Knight(obviously I love all the guys though), so it would hurt but it does make enough sense that I can see this becoming a thing. Best case scenario, maybe Marchy gets a team friendly year extension with us, and Marner will be his replacement going forward? Not gonna try to do the math on something like this but between Theo and Marchessault’s contacts being off the books, Marner’s inevitably huge extension would probably just barely fit.

  8. buzzinggibberish

    With both goalies having one year left on their respective contracts, I can’t really see them moving either one of them.

  9. Knights_When

    If I could move hill and Theo and get a great goalie I would. But, financially it doesn’t add it andbanking a ton of money in a goalie long term just doesn’t work out in a ton of situations.

  10. Throw_away91251952

    I think that in an ideal world, Hill can be traded for LT to be the starter, or at least be the 1A with 1B option for a tandem. But it’s not an ideal world. LT goes through stretches where he’s painfully average, which doesn’t work if/when the defense is also painfully average.

    Hill and LT play completely different styles but are roughly equal talent. But both of them go through those really hot and really cold streaks, we’ve just been lucky that they’re usually at different times. So trading one potentially forced the other to play when cold. It doesn’t work.

Write A Comment

Pin