@Rangers de New York

Agence libre de Steven Stamkos : 5 points d’atterrissage possibles



aflo112

22 Comments

  1. I wouldnt say no for the right price, but i cant believe Tampa is gonna let him walk. I get his 34, but still

  2. Beneficial_Radio_765

    Possibility is there for the right cash. That website stinks, tho.

  3. So which of Mika or Stamkos is playing RW?

    Because breaking up Panarin and Tro is a terrible idea.

  4. Funny_Papers

    Would rather get patty kane on a one year deal than go for Stammer. Kane’s play would be a better compliment to Mika and Kreider’s play styles. Then hopefully one of our prospects develops into a top 6 by the following year.

    Not the ideal path forward of course but seems realistic and, to me, a better option than Stamkos

  5. calcioybirra

    Won’t happen as the Rangers don’t have the space. Sure there is “$12.8m” in cap space but that’s before resigning guys. They are resigning Lingren and Schneider which will probably cost around about $6-7m for both. Leaving like $5-6M ish to play with which won’t be enough to get Stamkos.

  6. pony_trekker

    30 bucks? What are you crazy? I don’t have that kind of money.

  7. Stonewall30NY

    I don’t want that fucker. He spit in lafs face after a playoff game a few years ago.

  8. denver_and_life

    Fuck no. Will end up our version of Tavares. And we already have a needy and worthless in the playoffs center.

  9. Really don’t see the fit here and def don’t love the idea of signing an old forward that goes for Kane too though rather him

  10. labinnac_esproc_02

    Here we go ! That time of year to speculate superstars signing with the rangers !

  11. I think he’s to reliant on the pp and I’m assuming he’ll want a deal that’s probably 4-5 years long and I’m not really interested in committing to him for that long.

  12. HighFruitToastie

    Scorch me if you must… but I would much rather have Steven Stamkos over Brady Tkachuk. Not saying they’d plug the same hole. Not saying that any one is better than the other in any given column. I’m not even trying to say anything about contracts, salary caps, or future scenarios. It’s a respect thing. I have it for Stamkos in attics and I have it in B. Tkachuk in fallout shelters.

  13. Necdurgogan75

    Coming off a big contract where he can still probably demand a good price? Check
    League vet who at one point was a big name and star player? Check
    Cup winner? Check
    In his mid 30s and on the downswing of his career? Check

    Sounds like a Sather approved FA signing to me!

  14. Skies the limit if they can trade Trouba and Lindgren. Sign cheaper UFA’s to replace them like Pesce, Tanev, Dillon, Roy or Edmundson. You can probably sign Pesce and Edmundson for around $8m AAV combined.

    Stamkos could jump night into our Top 6 or you can balance out our Top 9 and have three scoring lines with Zibanejad – Trocheck – Stamkos down the middle.

    Kreider – Zibanejad – Chytil

    Panarin – Trocheck – Lafreniere

    Cuylle – Stamkos – Othmann

    Vesey – Edstrom – Rempe

    Dillon – Fox

    Miller – Schneider

    Edmundson – Roy

  15. frankthefrowner

    Chytil can not be relied on to be healthy or produce

  16. Someone will help Tampa out like they always do. They’ll shed cap and re-sign him. But if I’m wrong, I would absolutely give him 7 x 3. The ole Joe Sakic special.

  17. Those forward lines are beautiful. If we kept Kakko I’d have Vesey as the 13th F and go

    Panarin Trocheck Lafreniére
    Kreider Zibanejad Chytil
    Othmann Stamkos Kakko
    Cuylle Edstrom Rempe

Write A Comment

Pin