Smh. This is exactly what we need a 1 dimensional player who is old, slow and doesnt contribute on 5v5. Def the player to fill what killed us in the playoffs
Signal_Wall_8445
So, are we going to take Trochek off of the power play?
ExplosiveButtFarts2
I’m also weighing my options
TreeFugger69420
With the Trouba debacle in full debacle mode and the only names rumored to come here are 34 and older, I’m officially worried
flaamed
This sub is gonna be angry no matter who we sign lol, not a single consensus of who to get here
matt091282
Detroit is also going hard to try to bring him back. It should be interesting on Monday. Perhaps whoever lands Kane, Stamkos winds up going to whomever doesn’t get him.
ccafferata473
_Noah93
Wouldn’t mind Kane but it better not be for more than 2 years. He definitely had a good production season last year but also shot a really high % and his points could’ve been a little inflated. But he didn’t have a full offseason and training camp and kind of jumped right in so there is that. He’s not really a play driver anymore either so I don’t think he’s the solution for Mikas line but more so a good complimentary piece for a line. Not too concerned with the lack of physicality of the player can consistently contribute and be a positive impact. I don’t think we need to get stronger we just need to replace our negative players with positive players.
Alitaki
Has Stamkos ever played right wing?
PaulMarnersFurHat
I would much much much rather Kane than Stamkos that’s for sure
Brocktarrr
Scottu17
In other news, water is wet.
NYM32
with all the FAs and guys who aren’t being tendered contracts, there are so many better and cheaper players available, idk why we’re still on this
different position but Ottawa just let Brannstrom walk for nothing, whose underlying metrics are so good and if there was going to be another guy taking the Forsling path to NHL success, it could very well be him. but absolutely zero rumblings about NYR being interested, who need a defenseman, because of course not, because Brannstrom small
I was told Glen Sather retired. meanwhile, given every name tied to NYR so far, it seems that he has not
the Kings announced that they’re not qualifying Blake Lizotte. NYR would be way better off bringing him in for the bottom 6 and getting top 6 help elsewhere
SalivatingPony
So many people want Igor to take a discount to build a competitive roster. Meanwhile our front office spends that money on guys like Kane.
dsmithcc
Yea, lets go get the guy that didnt work out here a few seasons ago….very intelligent, Kane isnt the answer for this team than and he isnt now.
Rangbang
If he signs and we get Patrick *Showtime* Kane, fantastic! If we get Patrick *Once upon a time* Kane, not ideal at all.
Cool-Passenger-2595
Kane can weigh his options somewhere else
jkman61494
Please seek refuse elsewhere. Why bring back a failed experiment ?
all_no_pALL
Larry all hopped up on snake juice and tweeting
FoghornLeghorn999
Kane and Stamkos are the exact signings that the Rangers would make.
The same people as always will say why it’s bad.
They’ll find their way into the playoffs, but will not be good enough to overcome the no shows and aging players on the wrong side of 30.
The whole year people will call naysayers doomers and say « they have 105 points, what do you want?! »
Then they get bounced and next year is our year.
You are here: We get tied to big names in free agency.
21 Comments
#BREAKING
Smh. This is exactly what we need a 1 dimensional player who is old, slow and doesnt contribute on 5v5. Def the player to fill what killed us in the playoffs
So, are we going to take Trochek off of the power play?
I’m also weighing my options
With the Trouba debacle in full debacle mode and the only names rumored to come here are 34 and older, I’m officially worried
This sub is gonna be angry no matter who we sign lol, not a single consensus of who to get here
Detroit is also going hard to try to bring him back. It should be interesting on Monday. Perhaps whoever lands Kane, Stamkos winds up going to whomever doesn’t get him.
Wouldn’t mind Kane but it better not be for more than 2 years. He definitely had a good production season last year but also shot a really high % and his points could’ve been a little inflated. But he didn’t have a full offseason and training camp and kind of jumped right in so there is that. He’s not really a play driver anymore either so I don’t think he’s the solution for Mikas line but more so a good complimentary piece for a line. Not too concerned with the lack of physicality of the player can consistently contribute and be a positive impact. I don’t think we need to get stronger we just need to replace our negative players with positive players.
Has Stamkos ever played right wing?
I would much much much rather Kane than Stamkos that’s for sure
In other news, water is wet.
with all the FAs and guys who aren’t being tendered contracts, there are so many better and cheaper players available, idk why we’re still on this
different position but Ottawa just let Brannstrom walk for nothing, whose underlying metrics are so good and if there was going to be another guy taking the Forsling path to NHL success, it could very well be him. but absolutely zero rumblings about NYR being interested, who need a defenseman, because of course not, because Brannstrom small
I was told Glen Sather retired. meanwhile, given every name tied to NYR so far, it seems that he has not
the Kings announced that they’re not qualifying Blake Lizotte. NYR would be way better off bringing him in for the bottom 6 and getting top 6 help elsewhere
So many people want Igor to take a discount to build a competitive roster. Meanwhile our front office spends that money on guys like Kane.
Yea, lets go get the guy that didnt work out here a few seasons ago….very intelligent, Kane isnt the answer for this team than and he isnt now.
If he signs and we get Patrick *Showtime* Kane, fantastic! If we get Patrick *Once upon a time* Kane, not ideal at all.
Kane can weigh his options somewhere else
Please seek refuse elsewhere. Why bring back a failed experiment ?
Larry all hopped up on snake juice and tweeting
Kane and Stamkos are the exact signings that the Rangers would make.
The same people as always will say why it’s bad.
They’ll find their way into the playoffs, but will not be good enough to overcome the no shows and aging players on the wrong side of 30.
The whole year people will call naysayers doomers and say « they have 105 points, what do you want?! »
Then they get bounced and next year is our year.
You are here: We get tied to big names in free agency.