@Sabres de Buffalo

[JFresh] Deux tendances que j’ai remarquées : – Les équipes (NJ, BUF, LA) échangent leurs actifs appropriés (2e, Holtz) contre des 4e lignes autrement peu impressionnantes qui patinent vite et frappent (Malenstyn, Cotter, Jeannot) – Un petit D non physique qui déplace la rondelle qui ne sont pas des stars ? Sors de là.


[JFresh] Deux tendances que j’ai remarquées : – Des équipes (NJ, BUF, LA) qui échangent des atouts dignes de ce nom (2e, Holtz) contre des 4e lignes peu impressionnantes qui patinent vite et frappent (Malenstyn, Cotter, Jeannot) – Des défenses peu physiques qui déplacent la rondelle et qui ne sont pas des stars ? Sors d’ici.


PrinciplesRK

7 Comments

  1. PrinciplesRK

    Second point applies to Bryson so I included it. It’s not just the Sabres valuing a player like Malenstyn. It’s probably directly related to what we saw in the playoffs from Florida this year and Vegas last year.

  2. Straight_Landscape37

    Prior to joining the Panthers, Sam Bennett only had one 30+ point season. If the Sabres made the same trade Florida did to get him (2nd and a prospect) in 2021, I can guarantee our fanbase would be doom posting the night away.

    I’m not saying Malenstyn is going to suddenly break out and be a star (would be pretty cool if he does) but there’s clearly a market for gritty guys, and it requires a price.

  3. OpabiniaGlasses

    The difference being Paul Cotter and Tanner Jeannot are not career AHLers who finally broke through playing on the fourth line of a pretty mediocre Caps roster.

  4. serious_man_13

    I’m sorry, but there’s absolutely no reason to have a Bryson on the 3rd pairing.

  5. MidnightMass26

    Giving up Holtz is a lot worse than giving up a 2nd.

  6. Barmacist

    Physicality matters. Glad to be done with the OMG puck moving defenseman era.

  7. quickboop

    One trend I’ve noticed: JFresh being a bellend.

Write A Comment

Pin