@Maple Leafs de Toronto

Les Maple Leafs de Toronto évitent l’arbitrage avec Connor Dewar, que font-ils avec Nick Robertson ?


Les Maple Leafs de Toronto évitent l’arbitrage avec Connor Dewar, que font-ils avec Nick Robertson ?




JPPT1974

8 Comments

  1. SoupOfSomeYoungGuy

    Unless they agree to trade him, I dont think Nick wants to sign. We can’t just throw money at him to make the request go away.

  2. mikesully374826

    When you have the 17th and 37th best G/60 and P/60 at 5 on 5 in the NHL but your team refuses to play you it’s reasonable to want to play for a different organization.

  3. mattfromjoisey

    I think he’d do well in SJ/Utah. Younger teams and he’d hopefully get better minutes. We’re too top heavy for him

  4. McJoe77

    Robertson has no leverage, but the Leafs also don’t have a spot for him. I feel like they should move on from Jarnkrok and Kampf (if possible) and just create a handful of camp battles which would pencil Robertson in on the 3rd line, but as currently constructed. He’s in the same spot. He also has zero leverage because he isn’t going to sit out.

    He should probably sign a 1 year deal in like Switzerland or something, score 30 goals and make the Leafs do something next year. But I think eventually he signs a 1 year deal at like 900-950k and we continue to argue over why he’s the healthy scratch and not on the 3rd line.

  5. IAmTheBredman

    He signs a 1 year deal for around a mil. Leafs make some moves on the bottom of the roster to make space depending on what happens with hakanpaa. Timmins probably gets waived, and they start the year with no spare forwards and wait to see who gets injured.

    Not sure why so many people are unsure of what’s going to happen. Robertson is an rfa with no leverage contractually, or even from an on ice performance perspective.

Write A Comment

Pin