Les Bruins de Boston pensaient avoir forcé la tenue du sixième match à Boston, mais après révision, leur but en prolongation ne comptait pas.
@Bruins de Boston
Les Bruins de Boston pensaient avoir forcé la tenue du sixième match à Boston, mais après révision, leur but en prolongation ne comptait pas.
41 Comments
Bruins fans: OH, COME ON!!! (jeers in the background)
Senators fans: Phew!
#RIGGED #RIGGED #RIGGED #REPLACEMENT REFS #GOALIES FAULT #CLEARRRRRRRRRRRRRR GOAL
Bruins win
I hate Gord Downie he is an economic migrant.
hockey speed arts here!!!
WE STILL WON ANYWAY!!!!!
game 3 decided by refs. game 4 only goal scored is disallowed. game 5 disallowed goal, refusal to give penalty shot, bs penalty on bergy. NHL REFS ARE CORUPT!!!!
so when is the league going to fix the review process?
Personally I think it's goaltender interference the player made contact with Anderson
TOTAL BULLSHIT BY THE REFS!
Yeah I can't stand the Bruins but thats a goal
Writing this comment while only having seen the first 9 seconds of the video:
I feel I should point out that Andy Brickley(NOT Jack Edwards) said on the NESN broadcast that the goal should count because Kuraly could not have done much more to avoid Anderson than he did, that Methot had a lot to do with Kuraly's position when he hit Anderson, and that there was not excessive contact with Anderson. He also acknowledged that such an argument would likely be insufficient reasoning to allow the goal, regardless.
As you can see at 2:25 and 3:00, Anderson starts to lose his balance and fall before Kuraly even touches him. His leg moves out and he starts to fall. Also it didn't look like much contact, so I think it should have counted. Either way though, it didn't matter, the Hockey Gods were just teasing us all.
1:35 no, Boston didn't challenge, Toronto, or the refs, I'm not sure, initiated the review.
I love how even whenever the puck is clearly well past the goal line.. the defending players and goaltender are always scurrying to get it out of the net, as if it will make a difference haha
Refs gave this game to the Senators on a silver platter…and they still lost! Senators are a joke every game they've won has been decided by the garbage refs
Fire these refs. He's standing right there and doesn't signal anything. Goal. No goal. Nothing. Like he knows it's in but doesn't want it to count but can't think of a reason it shouldn't so doesn't do anything like an idiot. Then the other ref decides it's goalie interference later. Rubbish.
Hate the Bruins but this is a bullshit "goal"
More evidence of the NHL attempting to "fix" games…… That fall was as fake as a WWE Wrestling match if not more fake! A simple tap to his skates sent him flailing back into his net…LMAO he should have been given a penalty for diving!
I wanted Ottawa to win but I think this should have counted.
Ref wistle too early like usuall
as a sens fan.. yeah thats a good goal. GG's to Boston. They wanted it more and the sens blew a 2-0 lead. FFS. Oh well, see ya on Sunday in Boston
He shot it from the goal area…
Watch 3:28 kuraly had nothing to do with andersen falling, and he was also pushed nothing he could have done= not inference, and if you cover the puck in the crease at all it s a penalty shot, refs trying to let ottowa win again, Bruins prevail and beat refs and ottowa 5-2!
Good goal. Come on
bruins didn't get penalty? BJ did gg
Shoot, then tackle the goalie and you think it's goal. Dumb boston player.
HE SCORES!!! NO GOAL!!! SO THERE!!!
Kuraly with the hat trick!……kind of.
Refs , every game bruins play against senators, of course they make garbage decisions. That's why they went into OT 3 TIMES! Even this game, the refs were clearly rooting for the senators, and bruins still won! Not part of your schedule, huh ref?
Jeez, Let's take Bobby Orr goal away Too , Refs are awful, it's either rigged for Ottawa or they dislike the B's
It's nice to see everyone supporting Boston for once
I'm not a fan of the bruins but that was clearly a goal.
Terrible call. 3rd inappropriate goaltender interference(and lack thereof) call in the past 4 days
This was my first time watching this. Good thing the Bruins won because that's a goal. I was listening to the Ottawa radio broadcast in my car last night and those announcers thought it was a goal too.
I am a die hard Chicago fan and let me just say that my Blackhawks played like crap against the Preds and deserved to lose that series. Having said that, in game three the NHL allowed the game tying goal after Crawford was hit in a similar fashion. There seems to be no official consistency to how they call goaltender interference
I hate all this review crap. The game is going to get so aggravating, that people are just going to stop paying attention to it. For an example: what if "TEAM 1" enters the offensive zone but then-without coming out of the zone gets a penalty. But, "TEAM 1" was offsides going into the zone. Shouldn't the penalty be called back. I know that your not allowed to review penalties but technically it's not reviewing a penalty-it's reviewing offsides. So if the review garbage was out of the question, there would be nothing to argue about. This rule needs to be changed soon!
if ottawa scored the same goal it would have been allowed, its hard to watch this series when its brutally obvious the refs and nhl want the sens to win
Im a sens fan but come on he made contact with the goalie in the crease. If that happened to rask and they allowed the goalie bruins fans would be calling for goalie intererence. With that said, there should have been a penalty shot on pageau's cover up in the crease.
How did not go in
Sometimes a wonder if the refs are being paid to ruin the game.