John Shannon, un initié de la LNH, se joint à Ken Reid pour discuter de la façon dont les arbitres auraient pu réviser la passe de la main de Timo Meier qui a directement mené au but gagnant en prolongation d’Erik Karlsson. ———————————————- Abonnez-vous à Sportsnet sur YouTube – http://sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L Visitez Sportsnet.ca pour plus de nouvelles et de faits saillants sportifs – http://www.sportsnet.ca Suivez Sportsnet sur Facebook – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTFB Suivez Sportsnet sur Twitter – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR Suivez Sportsnet sur Instagram – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTINST Suivez Sportsnet sur Snapchat – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP Regardez Sportsnet sur Sportsnet maintenant – http://sportsnet.ca/now
@Sharks de San José
30 Comments
I think hand passes should be aloud
You should be aloud to smack the puck but not cover the puck or grab the puck
Toronto has play on film and million's see it on TV, then make the right call.
Sore loss, but Sharks are the better team. Get over it! If Meir wasn't obviously tripped on the play he could have used his stick. The rule states that a player is permitted to bat the puck out of the air with an open hand-this is exactly what he did. It wasn't a direct pass, in fact, St. Louis has a player closer to the puck. The refs could have stopped play, but did not, and that was their call, and I think a good one. The goal was good! It is part of hockey, that puck is floating around your face, bat it down with the hand, or wait if you are afraid the refs will stop the play and slap your wrist.
Get a hobby. Good non call.
How about the other 3 non calls that would have put SJ on the power play? Delay of Game, Head Contact to Braun, & Slashing to Haley? Guess we’re just going to ignore the reality that the Sharks would have won the game by 1 goal in regulation. Perron would be in the box.
The 17 dislikes are blues fans
I thought all goals in the playoffs are reviewed?
I don’t think any Blues fan has a right to complain unless they agree the goal after the missed delay of game shouldn’t have been allowed.
You people are still going on about this? Jesus christ get over it already. Blues had a chance to shut it down but didn’t, move on.
NHL destroying there own fan base
If the four on ice officials agree that none of them saw the infraction, they should have the option of reviewing any play.
He just hit it down, sure it went to his teammate but….
It wasn't a good goal, but I still don't think this rule would let them overturn it. It is really vague, but all the examples have two patterns: 1) All of them are fluky. 2) They involve something that causes the puck to go directly into the goal, which isn't what Meir did. If he had sent it into the goal, it would have been reviewed and overturned regardless of this rule. I don't even think this would have applied to the Columbus goal off the netting because it says there directly in the example "being directed immediately into the goal," which it didn't, a Blue Jackets player shot it in.
If they were able to invoke this rule, then they'd technically be able to invoke this for almost every goal, which maybe should be a thing, but that's for a different argument. Imo, if they used this rule for the hand pass, they'd have to use it in the future for tripping, high sticks, etc. on plays that lead to a goal. I think he's really stretching on this one.
Shannon's got those sjw glasses shudder
just embarrassing officiating this post season. the refs are confused and incompetent, too many absolutely AWFUL series changing calls
Has it been 100% determined that the puck didn't bump Bowmeisters shinpad after the hand pass? That would nullify the hand pass right?
Review for what……it's BLATANT.
It's time to start overturning obvious plays that just are illegal.
I love how sad and pathetic Sportsnet is. The Fox News of Sports tbh
The reason you don't allow hand passes in the offense is because guys were just falling on the ice in the face-off and gloving the puck to the defensemen.
Sharks in fo
Remove all screens in the arenas, and take hockey off TV. Fixed. You're welcome.
Video just described why the higher ups in the NHL are trash. They'd rather be consistent in doing nothing at all/botching the calls then to actually get things right and not look like imbeciles. John said they missed the puck hitting the netting thing in Columbus so thats why they didn't wanna do anything here. Thats top level moronic for me. Fire the lot of them and start over. The incompetence 100% comes from the top down in this case so i feel bad for most of the referees. I just hate the hot head ones that need to be noticed.
Or just do what your supposed to and throw the puck down to yourself and then pass it with your stick but I guess that’s to much effort
They should have done the same thing about the 1999 NHL OT goal that led the Stars to the cup over the Sabres. Funny how they got rid of the no goal crease rule the very next season.
The nhl sucks sometimes
I agree with allowing hand passes but only if it’s batted out of the air.
I want to keep the rule that you can’t close your hand around the puck.
I don’t really want to see guys catching the puck and throwing it around the ice.
John Shannon is an idiot. Don't know if it's on purpose or if he's just dumb. They couldn't review and overturn it. That rule applies to goals. The goal here was legit, the problem was the hand pass that led to the goal. There is just no reviewing that. It may seem like splitting hairs, bit it isn't. It's crystal clear. You review that then you're saying everything in between the drop of the puck from the last face off before each goal is reviewable
Just to be clear, the goal shouldn't have counted and the play should have been whistled down. I'm not debating that because there is no debate. But the rule is clear
Nice movie. However you can make it yourself. Just google woodprix and learn how to do it easily.
Bet yet they won't review when flower is out of the crease most of the time but yet they say "goalie interference"