@Ligue nationale de hockey

Rapport : Jeremy Swayman a refusé l’offre des Bruins


Les Bruins et Swayman ont négocié tout au long de l’intersaison, aucune des deux parties n’étant prête à céder sur ce qu’elle considère comme le bon accord. Selon Elliotte Friedman sur le podcast 32 Thoughts, les Bruins avaient un accord à long terme sur la table, mais Swayman n’a jamais signé sur la ligne pointillée.

« Je crois qu’à un moment donné, un contrat de huit ans était sur la table », a déclaré Friedman. « Mais c’était dans les six ans. Je ne pense pas qu’à aucun moment, quelqu’un ait été proche d’un accord. »

Huit ans pourraient être exactement ce que les deux parties recherchent en termes de durée pour un nouveau contrat, mais ce montant en dollars est loin de ce que Swayman recherchait.

Des rapports ont indiqué que Swayman a demandé jusqu’à 10 millions de dollars par an, mais Friedman a également été informé que le contrat signé avec le défenseur des Bruins Charlie McAvoy est plus proche de ce que Swatman recherche.

Pour référence, les Bruins ont signé McAvoy pour un contrat de huit ans d’une valeur de 9,5 millions de dollars par an.


ethereal3xp

29 Comments

  1. weschester

    Good for Swayman. Maybe the Bruins shouldn’t have out themselves in a spot with no leverage.

  2. Responsible-Heart-74

    How funny would it be if Columbus came into the picture for him

  3. jurkajurka

    The Bruins fell victim to one of the classic blunders.

  4. TrueCrimeRunner92

    Honestly hilarious for Boston to fumble what was the greatest goalie tandem in the league last year. That’s a management problem for sure.

  5. Shoddy-Wear-9661

    Bruins did the dumbest thing by trading away Ullmark to the Sens before signing Swayman. They essentially gave him the argument “I’m worth more than the year prior Vezina Winner, now pay me more than a Vezina winner”. Side note 8x9m for Swayman is very reasonable since there’s no more leverage on the bruins side.

  6. electricalphil

    Let’s not forget Swayman was choked with the stuff the Bruins said about him during his last arbitration.  So wouldn’t be surprised if he fucks them.

  7. rampas_inhumanas

    It’s about time they stopped getting sweetheart deals with their top players.

  8. Beardaway26

    As someone who doesn’t like the Bs I love to see this

  9. 240Nordey

    You pay heavily for a tendy, you’re gonna have a bad time.

  10. Shiny_Mew76

    I’m hoping Swayman signs for a lesser amount so Igor also does. If Swayman gets 10M, Igor might ask for something like 13M.

    Also I just don’t think Swayman is worth 10M, he’s an excellent goalie, but he’s not in that top tier caliber like Vasy, Hellebuyck, and Igor. I’d say he’s worth around 8M.

  11. krazyellinas23

    Love the Bruins but in no way is Swayman worth a McAvoy contract. I understand the hesitation in giving out a deal like that. He faded in the 2nd half of the season, people forget that. His game picked up near the end of the season but can he handle a bigger load? The maximum should be $7.5 aav, not McAvoy money

  12. xXxWeAreTheEndxXx

    Even if they don’t have him signed during the season, I’m sure Korpisalo will all of a sudden have the best year of his career because the Bruins can never just be bad

  13. Reminds me of when the Canucks went from having two stud #1 goalies to having neither of them in like a 6 month timeframe. Boston better give the man his money I guess.

  14. DropCautious

    **extreme Eddie Vedder voice**

    JEREMY SWAYMAN’S

    AT AN IMPASSE TODAY

  15. themapleleaf6ix

    Hasn’t Sweeny’s time as GM run it’s course, especially after the 2015 draft debacle? Or Mitchell Miller?

  16. Standard_Room_2589

    These reports reek of misinformation. Have never heard as much about a bruins players contract info as these reports speculate… in the last 20 years at least

  17. stillmadabout

    I guess if you are talking 8 years this is the conversation, but I personally thought Swayman would be more likely to do 2-4 years at something around $6.5 – $8mill. Then, he would cash out with an 8 year deal and mega money.

    In my head, doesn’t he want to let the salary cap go up as much as possible? There is a big stigma against signing goalies to big money right now. In a few years, maybe that attitude has changed due to changing thought processes and the cap rising. Boston likewise makes a short term commitment that guarantees them a competent cap structure now while allowing them to see if they really and truly want to commit long-term to Swayman.

    Just my thoughts.

  18. HockeyGuy601

    Not saying they were necessarily the wrong moves for the time but the Bruins essentially put themselves in this bind. They have already stamped out a lot of good will with arbitration and trading out his buddy Ullmark. Speaking from experience, expecting players, even as RFAs, to take a loyalty discount more often than not doesn’t happen.

  19. Only_End9983

    boy wants that sweet devils championship roster when we burn through 6 goalies this season.

  20. Zestyclose-Cricket82

    They should of signed him before trading Ullmark, now he has the big end of the stick in these negotiations

  21. PumaTomten

    Bruins also have a very promising goalie in AHL? They surely didn’t think this through sending Ullmark away quickly. 10million 8 years is way too much for a good goalie who only been sharing the starter position.

  22. TorturedFanClub

    Wish I could find some empathy but fuck the Bruins. Why did you trade away your leverage? Swayman is being a dick. Surprise!!

  23. Comet_Empire

    How can a goalie who hasn’t played one full season as the true number 1 goalie think he is worth 10mill? Based on what? 2yrs part time in goal is not a large enough tenure to be asking Vasy or Bob money.

  24. ResolutionNumber9

    8x6m offer? The Bruins will be lucky they didn’t insult him too badly with that offer. If he were insulted, I suspect he would have signed an offer sheet by now.

Write A Comment

Pin