Je sais que le sujet de Marchessault et de son contrat a été largement évoqué à ce jour, mais sachant qu’ils a fait En fait, lui offrir quatre ans et il a quand même choisi Nashville pour en obtenir un de plus est intéressant. Bien sûr, il y a toujours l’aspect de l’argent différé dont nous ne savons pas grand-chose. Mais ça fait mal de savoir que Marchy aurait pu être un Chevalier pendant quatre ans de plus et qu’il a quand même choisi de partir.
—
buzzinggibberish
6 Comments
If that’s true, we more than compromising with him. One extra year on his contract was worth more to him. Which, I’m not going to begrudge a man, take care of your own. But don’t be talking about anyone being unloyal.
Dude got excited to play with his boy Stamkos so he decided to blame the team so he wouldn’t look bad leaving
Dollar amount conveniently left out of that quote. And, you know, how long until those dollars would actually get to him. But whatever, tired of this being litigated. What’s done is done. He got the deal he deserved, management avoided commitment to an aging goal scorer. It’s fine.
Man everyone just needs to let it go. We chose to put more money elsewhere and he got a better offer. Cant blame him for taking it whatsoever but they can’t blame the team either. The dude is 33 now.. regression is bound to happen sooner than later. Just facts. The team and player benefited immensely from one another. It was a great tenure and let’s just be thankful it happened. We gave him a chance to be a star and he brought us a cup. Win fucking win
I have no problem with this. The four year deal was more than fair considering his age. I don’t blame him for getting a longer deal elsewhere, but I’m also glad the front office refused to budge.
‘Why didn’t you retire him? » « …he isn’t retired yet. »
This will not be his last contract.