@Avalanche du Colorado

Peter Worrell est l’attaquant le plus lent de l’Avalanche. Qui est le meilleur attaquant de l’histoire des Avs ?


Peter Worrell est l’attaquant le plus lent de l’Avalanche. Qui est le meilleur attaquant de l’histoire des Avs ?


thibs69

47 Comments

  1. Choice-Celebration-4

    Are repeats allowed? If not I’d say Forsberg

  2. ParagonSaber

    Sakic if repeats are allowed, Foppa if not.

  3. SomeDudeinCO3

    Well if Sakic is best overall, I’mma let you logic this one through. 

  4. i-might-do-that

    Forsberg. Great player that understood the role and executed well.

  5. schewbacca

    Forsberg was my « best » pick so still going with Forsberg with best forward.

  6. Repeats should be allowed, or else it doesn’t make sense. By default, since he was voted the best, Sakic is the best forward.

    This might change by the end of MacK’s career.

  7. Katyoparty

    I am a huge Avs fan but this chart doesn’t feel good. Calling out the slowest, etc. wtf??? Nah

  8. cbak9671

    I mean, if we’re not allowing repeats who are you gonna pick for best handles? No way there was any competition for Foppa in that category.

  9. rockhammersmash

    Forsberg. Even if repeats are allowed, if I had to choose one Avs player to will the team to victory, it would be Forsberg.

    Sakic would obviously be very close behind, but Forsberg’s physicality gave him another aspect to his game that Sakic couldn’t match.

  10. MiguelPopsicle

    Jokic won at least two categories in the nuggets sub, so repeats should be allowed. Super Joe!

  11. AVgreencup

    Forsberg is the definition of power forward

  12. Quake1028

    Forsberg for my money purely talent wise was a step ahead of even Joe. So he gets my vote.

  13. Hanksta2

    Forsberg.

    If he stayed healthy, he’s 4th all time in era adjusted points per game.

  14. Youngster_Joey14

    Many are saying Forsberg if no repeats, but if that’s the case I think he goes to Best Handles and you give this one to Hejduk.

  15. mileheitcity

    Sakic and Foppa are the obvious answers, but don’t sleep on MacKinnon, Landeskog, and Rantanen here either. I’m not saying this generation is better or worse, but I’m saying I’m not living in so deep in the past I can’t enjoy the present at the same time.

  16. Unknownfigure352

    I vote for foresberg, I have a Quebec jersey that is foresberg

  17. TheHizobane

    Forsberg 100%. He’s the reason I’m an avs fan, could absolutely take over a game and we can only dream of the Foppa we would have had if he didn’t have the ankle problems he had.

  18. Nightgasm

    Sakic. When Forsberg lost his spleen and couldn’t continue in the playoffs Sakic carried the team to the Cup.

  19. I’m going with MacKinnon. I just love watching him play with passion every game.

  20. wannabetmore

    Forsberg of no repeat. Sakic if repeat

  21. pemart22

    I will always say Peter Forsberg. I know 19 and 29 are in the mix, but Foppa was a force of nature when he was out there. Plus he literally gave his spleen for the team. 

  22. McMetal770

    At their BEST, Forsberg > Sakic. Nobody could take over a game by sheer brute force of will like Foppa. I think overall in their careers, Sakic has the upper hand because of his consistency and longevity, but if we’re not doing repeats, then the only guy you could really make a good case for is Forsberg.

  23. GaryOakRobotron

    I’d say Sakic due to sheer consistency, though Forsberg had higher highs. It’s just hard to argue against someone who holds most of the significant franchise offensive records, was top 10 all time in NHL history in points when he retired, and still has the most playoff OT goals and points in history.

    Also, shouldn’t the straight up best player according to this poll series also automatically best at his position?

  24. babsieofsuburbia

    Peter Forsberg! Fun fact, he was at Ball Arena the day I attended my first ever Avs game!

  25. AvsFreak

    The only one to have his picture on a postage stamp

Write A Comment

Pin