@Wild du Minnesota

Les gens disent qu’Ek s’est cogné le coude. Je ne sais pas… on dirait qu’il s’étend trop avec l’intention de prendre contact.


Les gens disent qu’Ek s’est cogné le coude. Je ne sais pas… on dirait qu’il s’étend trop avec l’intention de prendre contact.


HerbalAndy

8 Comments

  1. metalgoalie

    Larsson is playing the puck off the boards. His elbow incidentally hits him in the face. This is no different than an incidental high sticking penalty. It’s a painful missed call, but I don’t believe there was any malicious intent.

  2. SawdustIsMyCocaine

    It obviously wasn’t intentional, but it should have been called.

  3. HurricaneHomer9

    Probably should’ve been a penalty but he didn’t do it on purpose to Ek

  4. McPuckLuck

    Not a penalty. Same as a high stick on a follow through of a shot, not a penalty.

    His elbow is flared out because the boards are handcuffing his follow through. I think there is zero intent to hit Ek, it’s just unfortunate.

  5. wildwill57

    This is a split second judgement call by the referee and I don’t think anyone could argue if it had been called or not. Seems like most injuries happen with these types of is it a penalty or not plays.

  6. CanadaWildRyeBread

    It’s just a hockey play. Sucks for Ekker but it is what it is.

    My guess is he didn’t show any emotion either way…..

  7. shaman0610

    Yes, it was a missed penalty.

    No, there was not intent.

    I dare any of you saying it was intentional to practice digging a puck out from your feet from your backhand. Where the hell does YOUR elbow go?

Write A Comment

Pin