@Ligue nationale de hockey

Si vous deviez en choisir un, Makar ou Mackinnon ?


Si vous deviez en choisir un, Makar ou Mackinnon ?


Living-RentFree

36 Comments

  1. Makar. Seems like an easy question, honestly.

  2. makalder

    Keep them both and trade everyone else

  3. chachee

    Makar, by a [mile.](https://mile.You) You can let McKinnon go, pay the money he was getting to someone else and get 90% of the reproduction. You’re never getting another Makar at any price

  4. Canadian__Ninja

    They can easily afford both, but positionally I’ll take the Norris winning defenseman

  5. cheesegooze

    Makar easily. Rantanen has shown he can play 1C without issue and is possibly better as a center. Even without Rantanen Makar would be more difficult, if not, impossible to replace.

  6. teamswish123

    Harder to find Norris/franchise right-handed Dmen… Makar all the way

  7. OldTimeEddie

    Makar and that’s not really a choice.

  8. TheRealOgMark

    It may have been a debate if they were both 27 years old. It isn’t even Makar’s final form yet.

  9. Melle--

    Well Makar is actually signed past next season so this seems simple.

  10. jeffroavs

    We’ll pay both these guys and use Juniors to fill the remaining roster lol

  11. Gooner48362814

    Mackinnon is a ‘cherry on top’ player. Makar is a franchise player. Easy decision.

  12. GraciousGrackle

    Dumb question, especially if you’re talking right now.

    Ask me in a few years, with the caveat that we’ve seen both players at their peaks.

  13. Flex1855

    Makar defense is the most important position and he’s younger

  14. goatedgoat04

    Is this a question you guys are really asking sure mackinnion is a veteran who has served his years but makar has potential to be an all time great don’t get me wring mackinnion is an AMAZING player but makar could be the next great

  15. JuJewBea

    Both. There is no option where either leaves. I don’t care if that the only 2 players we have, suit up DU to play with them.

  16. Mwillcar

    As a loyal Avs fan I feel threatened by this question haha

  17. Kinda interesting. I think Makar is better. If I was starting a franchise and had to pick between them it’s Makar no question. But on this specific Avs team even if you take out Makar they would still have one of the best Defense groups in the league but wouls seriously suffer offensively without MacKinnon.

  18. mooseknuckle1001

    Nobody is going to pick Nathan cmon lol

  19. sextoymagic

    Very dumb post. Neither will be leaving in any reality.

  20. albableat

    My guy doing Nate dirty with this one LOL

  21. scandrews187

    Makar. Superstar defensemen are harder to come by

  22. AgreeableDouble8785

    Even if they were the same age, you take a franchise Defenseman. They are so valuable and rare to find.

  23. justaguy826

    Makar and it’s not particularly close. And this is not an indictment on MacKinnon. Makar is just that good.

  24. All_Canadian_Bud

    How are you now? Good to hear

    Makar. I’ll take an all world D all

  25. CookieMonsta94

    Well obviously you want to keep both, but if you have to pick one its Makar just based off age.

  26. Scared_Flatworm344

    Makar, but they are keeping both

  27. Smaug33

    If we can get a Josi for Makar then I would take Nate. But that is the only scenario.

  28. Badgerdont

    Makar but they’ll be able to keep both

  29. BR1N3DM1ND

    psshh, easy question. MacKar…n’n! *Obviously* we keep MacKar…n’n.

  30. KrebsCollector

    I like Mack more than Makar but a generational defenseman is harder to get than a star forward

  31. CountKristopher

    Makar. Younger and harder to replace an elite defenceman. Nothing against McKinnon.

Write A Comment

Pin