@Canucks de Vancouver

Rachel Doerrie sur sa plainte pour discrimination contre les Canucks de Vancouver



Rachel Doerrie, ancienne analyste analytique des Canucks et coach vidéo adjointe, s’est jointe à nous et a discuté de sa plainte pour discrimination contre les Canucks de Vancouver. *Nous avons demandé aux Canucks de commenter, mais ils se sont référés à leur déclaration originale* Présenté par @ProvinceofBC //linktr.ee/SekeresAndPrice https://twitter.com/sekeresandprice https://www.sekeresandprice.com/ https://www.stopoverdose.gov.bc.ca/

14 Comments

  1. so what.. if she has issues, let the court and the canucks office deal with it, and hopefully they will reach an agreement… i dont care. when your hire these people, you run the risk of them making it all about themselves and identity politics. couldnt care less.

  2. Hired because she was a woman is the bottom line. Then woke tears when she’s fired.

  3. If she's serious then don't talk publicly, let the courts do their job. This interview could be used against her. Sounds like a couple women fighting…

  4. Pro hockey is a tough, results based business. If you can’t be strong then don’t enter the business.

  5. If she sued them in a law suit, she would not only have to provide actual proof of the harm, but she would also have to pay for her own lawyers, rather than forcing tax payers to pay for it. She's suing them for compensation, so it basically is a law suit, just one that requires less proof, and she forces tax payers to pay for it.

  6. I bet these negative comments weren't being hurled at Mike Gillis when he had his legal action with the team. You can cheer for a hockey team and have a problem with the people who run it.

  7. Couldn’t watch beyond the first 3 minutes. Gotta blame the Canucks for not screening this hire more. Thank God it was a woman AGM who let her go. Good luck getting hired after this. She may have to go to Silicon Valley to fit in.

Write A Comment

Pin