Cela aurait-il dû être une sanction ? — Get-Cancelled Ligue nationale de hockeyLNHNational Hockey LeagueNHL Prev Post Fil du jour – 12 janvier 2023 janvier 12, 2023 Next Post Maillots Reverse Retro 2.0 que j’ai faits pour Minecraft (Division Atlantique) janvier 12, 2023 Related Posts MacEwen contre Xhekaj octobre 5, 2024 Le centre d’entraînement du Utah Hockey Club est unique en son genre | LNH.com octobre 5, 2024 Les Blue Jackets placent Dmitri Voronkov dans la réserve des blessés octobre 4, 2024 4 Comments tbiblaine23 2 ans ago Very clearly incidental. If you want to show some missed penalties in that game you could show the 4 they didn’t call on the leafs DBCrapper 2 ans ago By definition of the rule it’s interference HumanSun1 2 ans ago Foreshadowing another first round exit kadran2262 2 ans ago Should it have been called, probably . But I could see how it could be considered incidental contact, and usually, these types of things aren’t called Write A CommentVous devez vous connecter pour publier un commentaire.
tbiblaine23 2 ans ago Very clearly incidental. If you want to show some missed penalties in that game you could show the 4 they didn’t call on the leafs
kadran2262 2 ans ago Should it have been called, probably . But I could see how it could be considered incidental contact, and usually, these types of things aren’t called
4 Comments
Very clearly incidental. If you want to show some missed penalties in that game you could show the 4 they didn’t call on the leafs
By definition of the rule it’s interference
Foreshadowing another first round exit
Should it have been called, probably . But I could see how it could be considered incidental contact, and usually, these types of things aren’t called