@Flames de Calgary

Mikael Backlund ne sait pas s’il va re-signer.


Espérons que l’équipe trouve un moyen de le garder. Cela étant dit, je ne le blâme pas du tout.


DemonousXodus

26 Comments

  1. Didnt sound like Tanev and Lindholm really wanted to either. Pain.

  2. The next few seasons are going to be extremely painful if we don’t get somebody new behind the bench. Those interviews were misery inducing

  3. After-Peace

    God this is why I wish we didn’t re-sign Huberdeau or sign Kadri.
    Imagine the haul we get for Huberdeau at the deadline and Lindholm, Backlund, Tanev, Toffoli, Zadorov this offseason/next deadline.

    Yea we’d be rebuilding but could get a huge jumpstart with all those assets

  4. iggyisgoat

    Trade him. His value is at an all time high and it’s clear he’s likely walking next summer

  5. Accomplished_Skin_22

    I’d be hesitant to resign Backlund. He’ll be 35 next year and its not out of the realm to expect a drop off, same with Tanev. Lindholms going to wait to see if we’re actually good next year.

  6. HumbleInterest

    On the flip side, Toff said he did and would do so this season if they made an offer.

  7. jonos360

    I mean Backs and Lindy’s comments both sound like « If there’s change here that I’d like to see, then I’ll consider it », which makes sense given what we know about the team.

    Murray, you tax-sheltered, money-vault diving mallard, pay for a good coach who understands the game and isn’t an asshole to players. It’s what your nephews, Huby, Dube, and Lewis want from you.

  8. flyin_italian

    This, coupled with Lindholm’s cold response, at least in my eyes, needs to be the opening we need to start a re-something.

    This organization is always doing 1 useless tweak after another, as if we’re always just on the cusp. This season has shown us we’re not as close as we want to be.

    A new coach with nothing else would be a very « Flames » move.

    There’s no way that moves the needle enough.

    Backlund wants out, Lindholm wants out? Move. The. Needle.

  9. MonkeySailor

    So both Lindholm & Backlund, the top two centres on the team, have indicated they aren’t keen on re-signing, at least under the current circumstances. Basically seems like the Flames are getting a second chance to rebuild after failing to do that last year.

    Guess it’ll depend on when/if they change coaches. If the players still aren’t interested in re-signing, then the really won’t have a choice.

    Hanifin seemed pretty open to the idea of extending. Lucic sounds done.

  10. North_Plane_1219

    Of course he isn’t. This doesn’t mean anything one way or the other. If the Flames are competing, he’ll stay. If they aren’t, he’ll leave. That just makes sense, no?

  11. ballisticpumpkin5

    Honestly, backs deserves better. Been a warrior here so long and deserves a shot at the cup. His value is super high rn, and if we can deal him in the off season to a contender, it might be the best for everyone, shitty tho it may b

  12. 9159789

    I would be sad if he left. But good on him. As this year was a dumpster fire!! Sutter needs to go!

  13. Technopool

    He asked for a trade mid season. I think they need a big change behind the scenes to change these guys minds.

  14. askariya

    I’m down for this entire team to be just thrown in the garbage and started again from scratch. I was hoping that’s what we were going to do once Johnny didn’t re-sign. Even when we got Huberdeau and Weegar I was praying we were going to flip them for a million first round picks.
    It was the perfect year to do it, esp with Bedard being available.

  15. Welp I guess that makes things pretty clear; either trade everyone we can and start the rebuild at the draft, or fire Sutter and see how the team does in the first half of next year. If they falter, then trade everyone.

  16. CanadianRockx

    please don’t trade my boi :'(

  17. MonkeySailor

    > Backlund: « I’ve only been in the second round here. The year we had this year, it’s frustrating, for sure. »
    > « We’ll see what happens…The year we had, I’m 34 years old. I wanna win the Stanley Cup. »

    Gonna be real sad to see him leave but I get it. Really hope he can win a cup at some point. It should have happened here.

  18. gr8d4ne

    In all honesty, Backs does deserve more/better. Won’t blame him if he leaves, one hell of a stability player!

  19. SuperDashDingo

    Steinberg has said numerous times in the last few months that the Flames are uncertain about Lindholm’s desire to re-sign here.

    ​

    I think we’ve seen Lindy and Backlund’s final games as Flames. Hell of thing. This off-season should be interesting.

  20. Selmanella

    Barn burner was talking about how there are rumblings that the players in their exit meetings are more or less going to give ultimatums regarding Sutter.

  21. Puzzleheaded-Sea911

    Lindholm look says it all, time to move on from him!

  22. SomeJerkOddball

    The franchise is undergoing a rough transition brought on by the betrayal of Johnny and Chucky, the disintegration of Sean Monahan and the thieving of Mark Giordano. The core of our identity and leadership was ripped from us. Treliving did his damnedest to keep the ship afloat. One season in it’s unclear if he’s been successful. So I don’t blame guys for feeling uncertain about committing to the current situation.

    That said, it isn’t clear if Tree has been unsuccessful either. I’m among those who think that there’s lots of reasons to be optimistic for next season and that a bounceback is in the offing even with minimal changes to the lineup. Tree will do his best this summer to set us up for success. If the optimistic outlook comes to pass then I be they will reup during the season.

    Sutter will be on a short leash. If the team isn’t looking good come November-December the team will play the coaching card. And that has a good chance of changing the equation.

    If we still aren’t looking good come January-February, then guess what it’s fire sale time anyway and time to cash in on Hanafin, Tanev, Backlund and Lindholm anyway. Those guys could return a very strong haul of futures to speed us through a rebuild phase.

    This season is do or die for the team. I think they’re going to « do » rather than « die » but time will tell. At least taking the futures route doesn’t seem so unappealing.

    As for Backlund himself what absolutely kills me the most about this is that we could be robbed again of getting a second player to play 1,000 games as a Flame. Gio’s tenure ended at 949. Backlund’s will probably end somewhere between and 950-990 if he’s not back.

    Edit: if Tree is canned, then well, we skip to the rebuilt part and hope that they hire on a competent builder.

  23. MeursaultWasGuilty

    Man, if we lose Backlund I will be absolutely gutted. He’s been my favourite player going on a decade now. Critically underrated both around the league and by the fanbase. The dude provides the kind of structure and stability that you only notice once its gone.

    I really hoped he’d spend his whole career with us.

  24. CostcoTPisBest

    This is class. And exactly why I lost respect for JG.

  25. If he wants to win a cup. Then he won’t resign. Calgary is no where near cup contention status.

    Too good to finish in the bottom six. Not good enough to be a cup contender

  26. SGAShepp

    He’s one of the last player on this team I call a true Flame. If he left too, I’ll be heartbroken. One of my favourite players.

Write A Comment

Pin