@Lightning de Tampa Bay

Corey Perry du Lightning marque malgré la révision des buts et le défi de l’entraîneur par les Maple Leafs



Regardez l’attaquant du Lightning de Tampa Bay Corey Perry enfoncer la rondelle dans le filet des Maple Leafs le long du poteau gauche, et après que le but a été examiné par la ligue et contesté pour ingérence du gardien de but par Sheldon Keefe est toujours debout. ———————————————- Abonnez-vous à Sportsnet sur YouTube – http://sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L Visitez Sportsnet.ca pour plus d’actualités sportives et de faits saillants – http://www.sportsnet.ca Suivez Sportsnet sur Facebook – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTFB Suivez Sportsnet sur Twitter – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR Suivez Sportsnet sur Instagram – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTINST Suivez Sportsnet sur Snapchat – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP Suivez Sportsnet sur TikTok – http://sprtsnt.ca/ YTTIKTOK Regardez Sportsnet sur Sportsnet maintenant – http://sportsnet.ca/maintenant ———————————- ———— Sportsnet est le réseau sportif #1 au Canada. Votre maison pour les derniers faits saillants, les dernières nouvelles sportives, des interviews approfondies d’athlètes, des podcasts de pointe, des flux en direct et bien plus encore. Ne manquez pas un seul but de reel, un home run énorme, un dunk exceptionnel ou un touchdown époustouflant. Obtenez des scoops et des informations de pointe avec un accès inégalé. Apprenez à connaître une autre facette de vos superstars sportives préférées dans des interviews humoristiques uniques et décalées. Sportsnet est le guichet unique pour le fan qui sommeille en chacun de nous. ———————————————-

48 Comments

  1. Apparently Perry stayed on the ice after warmups the longest. Usually its marner and matthews for superstition. But Perry threw them off their game before it started. He was in their heads before the game even started lol. 🤡🤡

  2. That was literally goaltender interference. That's not a goal! THAT'S LETHARGIC! THAT'S A TERRIBLE CALL!

  3. Wah wah wah!!!! Cry me a river laugh nation, YOU BLEW IT!!!! As usual. Nice way to treat your fans. 😂

  4. blah blah blah…..like it would of made a difference for the leafs if it was disallowed…who cares.

  5. I’m all in on Tampa but—I don’t think this one should’ve counted! 🤷🏼‍♂️👀

  6. I absolutely hate the leafs, and love watching them lose. There is absolutely no way that goal should have counted. The bias against Canadian teams is alive and well so far in days 1 and 2 of the playoffs

  7. An entirely new goaltending controversy in Toronto! I'm guessing Keefe will be fined following his post-game assessment of the officials…

  8. Wes McCauley ref'd gm5 vs Columbus, gm6 and gm7 vs tampa last yr and last night… all leaf loses and Wes's brother in law is disgraced agent Dave Frost…… but no conflict of interest there.

  9. A corrupted league with a president suffering advancing Parkinson's desease holding on to his job faaaaaar too long.

  10. How do you stand a chance when powerhouse teams come to Toronto and play the poor innocent little victims against a team with a 56 year cup drought and the refs buy it?

  11. So since the it was called a goal by the official, the review has to find conclusively that it was not in. If the answer is that they cant tell either way, the call on the ice stands. Had it been called no goal on the ice, im sure on review it would have been called no goal, because its inconclusive. This is why you celebrate if you think you might have scored, you might just convince the officials you did, too.

  12. Man I thought the red wings had it bad with the refs back in their prime days.
    As long as hook nose Bettman is in charge you won’t see a Canadian team win, you’ll see them in the finals though.

  13. Not that it mattered in the long run, but uh… that puck never went in. Or at least there was never absolute proof that it crossed the line. You can't just "think" it's in. That's not how the rule works.

  14. In a situation like this, they should have the specific camera angle that proves it went over the line to play on the jumbo-tron when they make the call. If they can tell it went over the line, I'd like to see the proof. I'm not even a Leafs fan, I just find that call questionable. Not that it would have impacted who won this game.

  15. this is insane. It's literally touching the red post, which means it isn't over the line. I cannot for the life of me see how they concluded it went over. That is garbage call.

  16. The league needs to explain how a puck touching the post is crossed the line. The Leafs were never goign to win this game, they didn't really get screwed but what if that was game 7 in OT for the cup? Some how, some way there has to be some sort of goal line technology better than just a camera because thats a goal that should have never counted.

  17. It’s over for the Leafs. They spend too much money on players instead of zebras. GG.

  18. I'm an Oilers fan and it doesn't show that the puck totally crosses the line. Leafs still would have lost the game but the NHL has shown favor to Southern teams over Canadian teams many times in the passed. And it will continue

  19. NO GOAL !!!!! New staff!!!!! We need good refs or we are done , who is paying who in toronto 😮 , i would have never walked out on my leafs never , but I would have walked out of that game because of reffs , worste I've ever seen ever

  20. It actually didn't look like it was in. That should have been the call, if it did go in though, I wouldn't have called goalie interference, wasn't enough.

  21. Due to the call on the ice they don't need to prove it was a goal, they need to prove it WASNT a goal.

  22. You need to remember the camera isn't inside the post, it's behind the crossbar, so the puck could cross the line and from this angle appear to be touching it. This is why even if you can prove from this angle that the puck appears to always be touching the red line, thar STILL isn't conclusive not a goal.

  23. As i have no party pris in this , ill call it a good goal . No obstruction , the goal of the game is to score , the job of the goalie is to stop it . Good goal .

  24. One of the most clear no goals of all time. I’m actually blown away this could’ve gone through multiple reviews and still be called a goal… someone’s gotta be fired for this

  25. When they called the situation room nobody answered. The refs called again…no answer. Uhhh just keep our original call.

  26. I was at the game right over the net. I didn't see the puck in the net. I never had a proper video review of the play. Not sure what Camera the NHL war room is using, maybe they have one under the ice that we don't have the pleasure of viewing. But from this camera that was no goal. Puck never crossed the line, its pretty clear

  27. Why does the NHL always insist on HELPING the Leafs dismantle themselves? They can do it just fine on their own thank very much

  28. even as a habs fan, I would like an explanation from the "situation room" as to how they called this a goal…. WTF?!?!?!

  29. I guess you can push the pads of the goalie now. Just watch maple are going to score like this and the refs is going to say no goal.

  30. Perry a leafs killer! Ever since he destroyed JT he’s been living rent free in the heads of the weak leafs and their fans. Owned!!!!

  31. I'm a Boston fan and you can clearly tell that's a no goal. Leafs would have lost the game anyway but that was a bs call.

Write A Comment

Pin