Allvin essayant de réparer les dégâts de Benning. Cela pourrait nous coûter quelques choix
—
myownightmare
@Canucks de Vancouver
Allvin essayant de réparer les dégâts de Benning. Cela pourrait nous coûter quelques choix
—
myownightmare
31 Comments
Disappointing. Out of all our superfluous wingers, I like Garland the most.
Don’t trade him 😭🫡🫥
I’d rather trade Boeser than Garland. Maybe Garland is streaky but it’s not like Brock is a picture of consistency either. Plus, he has something that Boeser sorely lacks: speed.
According to who though? Seravalli himself? Cause he’s been full of shit long before diapers were even invented
I’m ok with it. He’s decent but doesn’t move the needle enough for 5 million when we are over the cap…
Of course Garland needs to go, Hronek and him hate each other’s guts! /s
Seriously though, the source is still Seravalli. I’ll sleep on this rumour.
But I was told he was worth the 9th overall pick alone when the trade happened lmao
If you think Garland or Boeser have negative value you can’t evaluate talent.
I think the return will be mostly meaningless (i.e 2nd/3rd rounders) but not negative
Garlands a good player, but this is 3 coaches now where he hasn’t contributed to special teams, and he ends up being a ~14-15 minute/night guy. And it’s not like he brings physicality/intimidation to the lineup.
He just hasn’t found a meaningful role in Vancouver, and they can’t afford to pay a guy $5M/year to play the role Garland does.
Especially when you have guys like Hoglander/Podkolzin cost 1/5 of what Garland does.
This is ABSURDLY stupid. He’s well worth his contract. He should have positive value. If he doesn’t, don’t trade him.
Dumb organization is dumb.
Canucks probably prefer to keep Boeser than Garland. After a hot start with the Canucks last year, Garland hasn’t really thrived under Boudreau or Tocchet.
imagine giving up a first to get him, then shedding him by giving up picks…
i dont give a fuck if the GMs think picks need to be packaged to dump player with term. Garland puts up decent points and is on an okay top-6 contract. And with an incredibly limp UFA class, there’s no reason why his value should go down just because of term
3 of these 5 players should be traded if we want to get better. We can’t ice the same team and expect different results.
OEL, Myers, Boeser, Garland and Beau.
OEL isn’t going anywhere unless we want to trade the 11th pick away.
Boeser wants to stay and his last half was actually very good. Given his connection to the city and Petey and what he went through, I’d keep him and make him a core player. I think he’s well respected and loved in the room.
So that leaves Myers, Beau and Garly who I don’t think anyone has a problem with trading away.
Just because teams are asking for picks to take on Garland doesn’t mean in the end we will be trading high picks to move him. Obviously teams are going to try to use our salary cap situation to leverage us in a trade but if we need to we could start the season on LTIR without making any moves. It would be nice to create some room to spend on a centre or D but I don’t think Allvin wants to get rid of him at any cost. He has said we aren’t in a position to lose good players for nothing so I don’t see us trading assets to get rid of him.
We will see what happens in the end. Someone may be interested in him after missing out on the free agent market. This is the early stages of negotiating.
He’s a gamer despite being undersized and I like his tenacity. I wish we can keep him over Boes especially if we want to be harder to play against but I do understand Garland is more appealing for prospective teams
Trying to undo Benning damage by spending picks? Ah that’s a well thought out plan for the long term, glad we’re past the days when we just kick the problem down the road for short term gain that doesn’t materialize because there are so many problems.
If this rumour is true our mgmt is ridiculous. Garland is by far one of the best players on this team who doesn’t require Pettersson to inflate his stats. His contract is great especially with his production playing on the third line and PP2. There is no good reason to keep Boeser or Beauvillier over Garland but fans won’t care because they are favourites. Even ignoring the facts, dropping him with picks is insanely stupid.
Nobody’s taking Brock sadly.
With so many terrible contracts that need dumping, how can you choose only one?!!!!
I’d rather buy Garland out than use a draft pick to move him. Anyone know what his buy out would look like?
I hate this. He is one of my absolute favorites. Guy never stops trying and has an amazing amount of passion for the game.
Would your rather trade;
Garland and a pick for future considerations
Or
Myers and Hoglander for future considerations
A lot being made about the Seravalli quote without using the full segment for context. He says after this that Allvin is getting the lay of the land for all his players before making final decisions.
With how the team has operated with its moves, it wouldn’t surprise me if it’s another player that is moved that we haven’t heard about.
Whatever it costs to get cap space this summer has to be factored in when evaluating the Hronek trade.
I still think that we might buyout Garland. Especially if this is true that there isn’t a trade market for Garland.
We need capspace and that is one of the easiest ways to create it. It’s not a prudent move but I we aren’t in an ideal position and I could see it happening.
A garland buyout + a Myers trade with 2-3mil retained seem like two very doable options that creates 7+ mil in cap space.
I think beau with retention on salary is the most likely outcome
I don’t believe it. He’s tenacious, skilled, and keeps the room light. Plus he’s one of our best 5v5 producers. If we’re attaching an asset to lose any contract, it’s Boeser’s.
We should even trade new Beau before Garland
He’s one of the best 5v5 players on the team. Ahead of Petey, hughes, horvat in his first season here.
Move beavuiller,Boeser,and Miller. OEL goes on LTIR. That would the greatest offseason in a decade.
To me Garland and Hoglander provide the same role…smaller guy who is a tenacious forechecker who can score as a middle six winger. Canucks are in such a cap crunch that they need to shed salary and Hoggy can fulfil that role at 50% of the price.
The current management group proves their incompetence with every move. Anyone remember when we were 6th worst and had a better shot at Bedard?