J’ai une bonne idée de cet été, après que nous ayons signé tous les joueurs importants à l’exception de Smith. Puisque nous avions apparemment besoin d’argent pour Barbs, je ne comprends pas pourquoi nous n’avons pas décidé d’économiser ces 5 millions en ne signant pas Hill. Je reconnais son rôle dans la victoire de la coupe. Néanmoins, nous l’aurions également gagné avec un Brossoit ou un Thompson en forme (je me rends compte que ma prise devient encore plus chaude). Ce que j’essaie de dire, c’est que notre défense était la raison pour laquelle chacun de nos 5 gardiens de but avait l’air parfait. Alors que Hill n’a définitivement été surpayé qu’en raison de la «taxe sur la coupe», Smith aurait gagné ces 4,9 millions. Nous nous débrouillerions également très bien avec Thompson & Brossoit pour la saison prochaine. Cela dit, je n’ai pas encore été directeur général. Et beaucoup de choses sur lesquelles j’étais sceptique (Fleury, Schmidt) se sont avérées être la bonne décision. Dans certains j’avais raison (Suzuki). Dans quelle catégorie le départ de Smith atterrira-t-il?
—
_jkobi
12 Comments
Who knows if thompson holds up we need hill so they can split opportunities so we can atleast have one healthy to defend our cup
Barbashev is younger and getting the same amount of as Smith.
Ez decision by management. You should be used to management being ruthless at all costs.
Lol this is where we’re at for the summer now? Random click bait posts trying to start a fight?
Sure man. If you love Smith then good on ya, we all do. But he’s not on the team anymore 🤷🏽♂️
Bro was great, but hill earned that contract full stop. We need multiple goalies, and him + Thompson for under 6 mil the next 2 years is a great deal. I always liked Smith, but for 5 mil keeping Barbie over Smith was an easy decision.
Smith isn’t getting any younger, whereas Barbashev cemented himself a role here long term. On top of that, Hill earned the opportunity to further improve his standing as an NHL goaltender in this league with his play, and Vegas needs proven bodies in the net in order for the system to work at its best. That’s BTW no disrespect to Thompson, as he’s young and will only get better, but Hill’s cup-winning experience with this team will have potential to be massive for this team moving forward, and him + Thompson as a tandem literally has the potential to be another Jennings Trophy tandem.
Smith’s still a good player, don’t get me wrong, but being on the wrong end of 30, and having other players come in and move you down the lineup, while having an unsustainable cap hit, is not how you stay on a team whom is against the cap.
I’ll take a Jennings Trophy potential tandem + Barbashev, over utilizing $10,000,000 on both Barbashev & Smith, while not having as loaded of an overall goaltending room.
Why are you comparing a goalie to a forward. It’s like asking why did you buy a new refrigerator you have a perfectly good TV. There are only so many spots to fill, Barbie is better and younger than Smith for the same price. Now a spot for Dorofeyev or Kotter opens up. Pretty typical off season moves.
Hill 100% earned that contract. Smith is 32, Barbie is 27. Easy choice
You’re dead wrong bud.
Hell of a Hill to die on, but okay
I mean we need two goaltenders and there aren’t many that are cheap, we got 2 pretty damn decent to excellent goaltenders at under 6 million and many teams hope to just get 1 for under 8
The math isn’t mathing. Even if they opt for Brossoit over Hill and keep Smith, they’d still be 2 mil over the cap so *someone* would be getting shipped out
Barbie > Smith
So im guessing hill is gonna start over thompson? That kinda sucks imo, i love watching logan play and i feel like he leaves for a better contract if he doesnt start