If we wanted Boqvist, we would have offered him the 1 year 775k contract he got from Boston.
DontDraftSmall
No Bo in Boston
Appropriate-Hunt4163
I’d rather have Boqvist than Holtz on the 3rd line.
peppy871
If we weren’t stacked already I’d take him back. Too many bodies and he doesn’t really move the needle above anyone else we now have.
Mr7three2
JeBo!
PFalcone33
Hmm.
chrishic99
We gave boqvist a whole year in the NHL and he either couldn’t crack the lineup or was invisible when he did play. The roster is too log jammed for him at this point
AlpineSK
I was watching his numbers through the preseason. He was just as underwhelming in Boston as he was in NJ. And he had a much better chance there than he ever would have here with their weaknesses up the middle.
8 Comments
If we wanted Boqvist, we would have offered him the 1 year 775k contract he got from Boston.
No Bo in Boston
I’d rather have Boqvist than Holtz on the 3rd line.
If we weren’t stacked already I’d take him back. Too many bodies and he doesn’t really move the needle above anyone else we now have.
JeBo!
Hmm.
We gave boqvist a whole year in the NHL and he either couldn’t crack the lineup or was invisible when he did play. The roster is too log jammed for him at this point
I was watching his numbers through the preseason. He was just as underwhelming in Boston as he was in NJ. And he had a much better chance there than he ever would have here with their weaknesses up the middle.